Criteria |
Eval |
Comments |
1. Statement of Scope |
|
|
|
Pathfinder topic is clearly defined and described |
|
|
|
Purpose of the pathfinder is clearly stated |
|
|
|
Intended audience is specified and described |
|
|
2. Vocabulary |
|
|
|
Relevant controlled vocabulary terms specified |
|
|
|
Useful call # areas for browsing provided |
|
|
|
Relevant free text terms or topic synonyms provided |
|
|
|
Tips on how best to use vocabulary provided |
|
|
|
3.
Indexing/Abstracting (print or online) |
|
|
|
Annotations are present |
|
|
|
Relevant search terms and/or search strategies |
|
|
|
Distinction clear about search services & databases |
|
|
|
List is selective and appropriate for the topic |
|
|
4. Print Resources |
|
|
|
Rationale for each title's inclusion is stated |
|
|
|
List is selective and appropriate for the topic |
|
|
|
Titles are scholarly or research in focus |
|
|
|
Title categories are, organized, defined & logical |
|
|
5. Online Resources |
|
|
|
Annotations are present |
|
|
|
Items are selective and appropriate for the topic |
|
|
|
Rationale for each item's inclusion is clearly stated |
|
|
|
Sources are selected using course selection criteria |
|
|
|
Resources clearly organized into logical categories |
|
|
6. General Comments about Resources |
|
|
|
Categories are appropriate and clearly defined |
|
|
|
Points to relevant variety of types (varies by topic) |
|
|
|
Miscellaneous resources included as appropriate |
|
|
7. Format and Organization |
|
|
|
Format/Organization functional, well thought out |
|
|
|
F/O add to pathfinder's quality and usability |
|
|
|
Citations complete; standard bib form (APA, MLA, etc) |
|
|
|
Links to online resources are direct |
|
|
|
Clearly indicates how a resource included, how useful |
|
|
|
Resources included selectively, not comprehensively |
|
|
|
Relevant mix of print and electronic resources |
|
|
|
Grammatically correct, no spelling errors / typos |
|
|