The University of Oklahoma

College of Liberal Studies

Humanities of the Modern World 

LSTD 3243  707
March 15, 29, April 5, 12, 19, 26, May 3, 2007
5:30-9:30 pm
Oklahoma City Community College
Room 2N3

 

 

 

Course Description

A general survey to help you understand the relevance of the humanities, this course is a guided study exploring a vast period of time and activity from the Renaissance through the present. We will cover a broad range of topics and, at the same time, engage in deeper explorations of areas of particular value to you as a student and as a human being.

 

 

Course Objectives

After completing this course, you will:

1.      Better understand the impact that the humanities have had on different societies through time.

2.      Review the pertinent definitions of and terminology for the different areas of the humanities.

3.      Gain a historical framework for understanding the humanities from the Renaissance through the modern age.

4.      Be able to accomplish an in-depth comparative analysis of the humanities across cultures and time periods.

5.      Understand how the various areas within the humanities interrelate.

6.      Have an opportunity to formulate and express your own ideas about how social values are experienced through the humanities.

 

 

Textbooks and Instructional Materials

The following texts have been selected to provide you with a broad view of this complex subject. In addition to reading about art, music, architecture, history, and philosophy, you will be reading two major works of literature, works which I hope will stay with you for many years to come.

 

Required texts for this course

1.      Dennis J. Sporre, The Creative Impulse: An Introduction to the Arts, 7th edition. New York: Prentice-Hall, 2005. 0131936808

 

2.      William Shakespeare, Hamlet. New York: Signet, 1998. 0-451-52692-9 (preferred edition because it includes an essay—Maynard Mack’s “The World of Shakespeare”—to which we will refer in class)

 

3.      T. S. Eliot, The Waste Land and Other Poems. New York: Signet, 1998. 0-451-52684-8

 

For additional help with your writing, the Purdue University Writing Center web site is outstanding. Find this web site at: http://owl.english.purdue.edu.

 

 

The Four-Part Structure of the Guided Self-Study

This course will meet seven Thursday evenings in the spring 2007 semester. There are four units of study to be completed for the course.

 

Class—what you can expect

Yes, you do have a life outside the classroom. On Thursdays, before our class meetings, you probably have worked a full day. Because of this, you may be tired and not particularly excited about exploring literary, religious, historical, artistic, musical, or philosophical ideas and texts. I hope to enliven these class sessions with movies, recordings, slides, and other media. We will have some discussion or other response to these media presentations—and I will present some information via lecture. We may take a field trip to a local museum or exhibition. We of course will take breaks throughout the evening. At the end of each unit, you will take a quiz. The goal is to cover this extremely broad topic as effectively as possible—and to have a good time while we’re doing it!

 

 

Writing—and Its Importance

I regard writing as important and, as course time allows, will present concepts and approaches to help you improve your writing. In terms of writing for this class, you will write two 2-3-page response papers (see details below). I also propose that you keep a journal for this class to record your reaction to Hamlet and his alleged “inaction” or something you’ve noticed in one of Georgia O’Keefe’s paintings or Dave Brubeck’s “Take Five.” This journal is not required and will not be collected or viewed by me. But it would be a way to practice your writing skills. You improve your writing by writing.

 

The point: After this class, you may never again be called upon to write about literature or any other art form. That’s not the point. In life your opinion will be sought. You will write letters or email messages or give presentations that convey thoughts, both deep and shallow. You will expect your audience(s) to understand clearly what you are talking about. I know of no better way to learn how to organize your thoughts and communicate than to learn and practice the fine art of writing. In business and in personal interactions with others, you will draw upon this skill for the rest of your life—and it will make a difference in the quality of your life.

 

 

March 15-29, 2007—Part I: The Renaissance and Hamlet’s World View

What was really “reborn” in the Renaissance? Art, music, literature, and religion will be our terrain, and Shakespeare’s Hamlet will be our principal guide. We will watch scenes from two or three filmed versions of this play.

 

Part I Reading (to be read before class)

Hamlet (You need only read the play; however, I commend to you Maynard Mack’s fine essay, “The World of Hamlet,” pp. 191-213, included in this edition.)

 

The Creative Impulse readings:

Chapter Ten: The Early Renaissance

Chapter Eleven: The High Renaissance and Mannerism

Chapter Twelve: Renaissance and Reformation in Northern Europe

 

 

April 5, 2007—Part II: The Enlightenment

Throughout the Middle Ages people looked to the church and to the clergy to provide answers to the major questions in their lives. The Enlightenment ushered in a new faith, one based on human reasoning and intellect. This movement was reflected not only in works of art, music, and literature but in new developments in government and society.

 

Part II Reading (to be read before class)

The Creative Impulse readings:

Chapter Fourteen: The Enlightenment

 

 

April 12, 2007—Part III: Romanticism

Calling something “romantic” usually conjures images of hearts and flowers and other Valentine’s Day clichés. But Romanticism is a formal philosophical perspective and artistic movement. We will consider primarily the artistic and musical tradition.

 

Part III Reading (to be read before class)

The Creative Impulse readings:

Chapter Fifteen: The Romantic Age

 

 

April 19-26, 2007—Part IV: From Modernism to Postmodernism

What are recent examples of how the humanities have turned up in our lives and helped shape us? T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land will be our starting point for understanding modernism and postmodernism, buzzwords of our present day. (Don’t fret about this poem. I will give you some helpful guideposts; we will not be analyzing it in detail. Rather, we will look at it as a kind of lighthouse to ships on the raging sea of modernism. That’s a metaphor!) We will listen to music, view films and art, and discuss some of the historical/cultural aspects of life in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.

 

Part IV Reading (to be read before class)

T.S. Eliot, The Waste Land (pp. 32-59 of The Waste Land and Other Poems; it is highly recommended that you also look at the annotations to the poem on pp. 85-93)

 

The Creative Impulse readings:

Chapter Seventeen: Modernism

Chapter Eighteen: From a Modern to a Postmodern World

 

 

Response Papers

You will write two 2-3-page response papers on the following topics:

 

Topic for response paper #1: Hamlet is one of the most complex, and controversial figures in all literature. Was he wise, shrewd, and calculating or a fool who could not make up his mind and then take proper action? Put Hamlet behind a corporate desk and use your paper to describe the kind of leader he would be. Use specific examples from the play to support your view.  This paper is due: April 5.

 

Topic for response paper #2: Choose one modernist work of art (painting, sculpture, music) and discuss what makes it “modern” OR: choose a postmodern work (painting, sculpture, music) and discuss what makes it “postmodern.” You will need to describe the work, but most of your paper will be a.) your discussion of modernism or postmodernism and b.) your response to this particular work. This paper is due: April 26.

 

Your response papers should be typewritten, double-spaced, properly punctuated, and correctly spelled. Draw your own conclusions and observations and don’t just recite what someone else has written about your topic. I am looking for thoughtfulness, originality, clarity, and general writing effectiveness. These papers should be opportunities to react thoughtfully to material we have read, looked at, or listened to. No library research is necessary for these papers, though you may choose to do some Internet research or you may need to view a film. Other than Internet, any citations (use Chicago Manual of Style, MLA, or APA style guidelines as your prefer but be consistent) should be to the works we use in class. Also, make sure your paper has a TITLE.

 

 

An Unfortunately Necessary Note on Plagiarism

It is unpleasant to deal with this topic because many students automatically assume that if I bring it up I do not trust them. That is not the case. I assume every student in my class is a trustworthy person of integrity. We will devote some time to properly citing information in papers from other sources. My policy is, simply, any paper discovered to be bought or which includes unattributed material from others will automatically receive an “F.”

 

 

Group Presentation

For the last class meeting, you and your team will choose ONE of the following areas to develop a group presentation:

·        Despite the Reformation’s clash of Catholicism and Protestantism, there are so many other religious traditions at work in the world. Select a religion other than Christianity, Judaism, or Islam and describe the God/gods, worship practices, believers, and anything else that would help the class understand this spiritual community.

·        Present a postmodern “take” on Hamlet. This may include acting out a scene from the play or a dramatic reading, though these are not essential. At any rate, an interpretative analysis should be part of the presentation to demonstrate how a postmodernist might look at this play and its characters.

·        Select four major non-scientific figures (e.g., artists, philosophers, writers, religious leaders) in any given century between the fifteenth through the twenty-first centuries and use them to represent the changes, innovations, advances, controversies, and/or other developments of that particular century.

 

Be sure your 30-minute presentation addresses the issues of:

·        Relevance—how is your topic relevant to our lives right now in 2007?

·        Context—call attention to the historical and other relevant contexts of your topic. E.g., if choosing option #3 above, how did contemporary (at that time) political issues influence your chosen figures?

 

The fairest approach is to break down your topic and divide the work among your team. Every member of the team should participate in this project!

 

The presentation may include music, pictures, etc.—anything to make it more interesting. PowerPoint presentations are fine. I have had groups create game shows, tests, movies, protest demonstrations, songs, and other activities to teach the class. Essentially, your group becomes the instructor for your 30-minute time slot. Your grade will be based on preparation, creativity, originality, thoughtfulness, information conveyed, how you address the relevance/context issues, and use of the time.

 

 

Course Deadlines

4/5/07             Response paper #1 (2-3 pages) due

4/26/07           Response paper #2 (2-3 pages) due

5/3/07             30-minute group presentation delivered in class

 

 

Grading

You will receive a letter grade for this class. Grading for this class is based on:

1.      four quizzes (40% of grade)

2.      two response papers (30%)

3.      one group presentation (30%)

 

I do not award credit simply for being in class. I assume, barring some emergency, that you will attend class. It is not my intention or wish to “flunk” students. However, grades are required to measure your course progress, and I will issue grades based on my assessment of your course accomplishments. I do not give “A”s for effort.

 

You may appeal to me any grade you feel is unfair or undeserved. A proper grade appeal will come in the form of a typewritten request. In this request, you must explain why you believe the grade is an inaccurate reflection of your abilities and should be changed. Grade appeals via phone or in person will not be considered. After receiving your grade appeal, I will make a judgment objectively based on the merits of your case. If I decline to change the grade, your next step will be to initiate a formal grade appeal through the Dean of the College.

 

 

Team Cooperation

There is only one graded team assignment in this course: the group presentation. Everyone in your group should be in accord about the topic choice. All should be involved in researching/preparing for/presenting the topic. As mentioned above, I am open to all forms of presentations—PowerPoint, overheads, videos, etc.—as long as your technologies are compatible with those available on the Oklahoma City Community College campus.

 

Part of the purpose of this team assignment is to create opportunities for you to learn and sharpen your teambuilding and team participation skills. Also, this is an opportunity for you to build confidence in your writing and presentation skills.

 

It is not my place or purpose to oversee your team’s cooperation and development. If you believe a team member is not performing assigned tasks, it is your responsibility as a team, not mine, to deal with that situation. If your team experience is unfruitful and frustrating for you, and if you feel your grade suffered accordingly, you may do additional work in order to boost your grade. However, since this program revolves around teamwork, you should make every effort to be a cooperative and productive member of your team.

 

Academic Misconduct:

 

Any act which improperly affects the evaluation of a student's academic performance or achievement, including but not limited to the following:

 

(a)   Cheating: the use of unauthorized materials, methods, or information in any academic exercise, including improper collaboration;

(b)   Plagiarism: the representation of the words or ideas of another as one's own, including:

(1) direct quotation without both attribution and indication that the material is being directly quoted, e.g. quotation marks;

(2) paraphrase without attribution;

(3) paraphrase with or without attribution where the wording of the original remains substantially intact and is represented as the author's own;

(4) expression in one's own words, but without attribution, of ideas, arguments, lines of reasoning, facts, processes, or other products of the intellect where such material is learned from the work of another and is not part of the general fund of common academic knowledge;

(c)    Fabrication: the falsification or invention of any information or citation in an academic exercise;

(d)   Fraud: the falsification, forgery, or misrepresentation of academic work, including the resubmission of work performed for one class for credit in another class without the informed permission of the second instructor; or the falsification, forgery or misrepresentation of other academic records or documents, including admissions materials and transcripts; or the communication of false or misleading statements to obtain academic advantage or to avoid academic penalty;

(e)   Destruction, misappropriation or unauthorized possession of University property or the property of another;

(f)      Bribery or intimidation;

(g)   Assisting others in any act proscribed by this Code; or

(h)    Attempting to engage in such acts.

 

Penalties are listed in the Academic Code. For further information on academic misconduct please refer to the following link: http://www.ou.edu/provost/integrity/

 

Disability Issues:  Any student in this course who has a disability that may prevent her or him from fully demonstrating his or her academic abilities should contact Frank Rodriquez (405-325-1061) as soon as possible to discuss the accommodations necessary to ensure full participation and to facilitate your educational opportunities.  For further information on disability issues please refer to the following link:  http://ods.ou.edu/      

 

 

 

Instructor: Jerry Jerman

325-1254 (office)

329-6152 (home)

jjerman@ou.edu

 

I was born and raised in Oklahoma City. I received a B.A. (English) from Oklahoma City University, an M.A. (English) from the University of Iowa, and an M.F.A. (writing) from Bowling Green State University. Currently, I am Director of Development for University Outreach, which includes the Colleges of Continuing Education and Liberal Studies. I have written six published children’s books and edited books on residential continuing education and adult degree programs. In addition to my Liberal Studies courses, I have taught English at Oklahoma City University and Bowling Green State University, workshops about writing and marketing, and film classes for OU.

 

Each college instructor you encounter has different strengths and interests. My own background falls in literature rather than other areas of the humanities, though I have some experience with art, film, religion, and history. If you are curious about my preferences, the following list of literary, historical, musical, and filmed works have particular meaning for me.

 

Martin Amis, Time’s Arrow

Karen Armstrong, A History of God

Johann Sebastian Bach, The Goldberg Variations

James Baldwin, Nobody Knows My Name

The Bible

Daniel J. Boorstin, The Creators

Dee Brown, Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee

Joseph Campbell (with Bill Moyers), The Power of Myth

Aaron Copland, “Fanfare for the Common Man”

E. L. Doctorow, Lives of the Poets

Peter Gabriel, Passion

Werner Herzog (dir.), Aguirre, the Wrath of God

Hermann Hesse, Siddhartha

Alfred Hitchcock (dir.), Rear Window

Jon Kabat-Zinn, Wherever You Go, There You Are

Jerzy Kosinski, Steps

Malcolm X (with Alex Haley), The Autobiography of Malcolm X

Joyce Carol Oates, many of her short stories

Georgia O’Keefe, any of her New Mexico paintings

Roman Polanski (dir.), Chinatown

Popular music by Steely Dan, Rolling Stones, Talking Heads, and Frank Sinatra

Daniel Quinn, Ishmael

Philip Roth, The Breast

Leonard Schlain, The Alphabet Versus the Goddess

Ben Shahn, many of his paintings of social commentary

Jim Thompson, Pop. 1280

Orson Welles (dir.), Touch of Evil

 

For me, the great mystery of life—and its humor—is aptly captured in this remark from author Saul Bellow:

 

There are many skeptical, rebellious, or simply nervous writers all around us, who, having existed a full twenty or thirty years in this universe, denounce or reject life because it fails to meet their standards as philosophical intellectuals. It seems to me that they can’t know enough about it for confident denial. The mystery is too great. So when they knock at the door of mystery with the knuckles of cognition it is quite right that the door should open and some mysterious power should squirt them in the eye.