|
||||
|
.
Correction of an amontillado (amon) cDNA artifact and identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the amon gene.
Rayburn, Lowell Y.M., Semil P. Choksi, and Michael Bender. Department of Genetics, Life Sciences Building, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
Comparing
genomic sequence (Adams et al., 2000) with an amon cDNA
sequence (Siekhaus and Fuller, 1999) showed that the first 43 nucleotides
of this cDNA do not align with upstream amon genomic sequences. They do, however, match sequences
within more 3' areas of the cDNA (see Figure 1A), suggesting that the first
43 nucleotides may be an artifact of cDNA cloning. The 43 nucleotides can be separated into two components. Nucleotides
3-21 (bold type) match those at positions 3268-3286 (bold type) of the cDNA,
and nucleotides 18-47 (underlined) reverse complement the sequence from 3225-3254
(underlined) in the 3’ end of the cDNA. The Berkeley Drosophila Genome
Project (BDGP) database contains 12 amon EST sequences, eleven of which extend further 5’
than the cDNA reported by Siekhaus and Fuller (1999) and do match genomic
sequences. The two amon ESTs
with the greatest 5' extent (BDGP clone ID #RE06156 and #RE58333) lengthen
amon cDNA sequences by 64 nucleotides
(Figure 1B). Good matches (4/6 nucleotides, underlined) to a consensus Drosophila
Initiator sequence at the 5' end of the cDNA and to the Drosophila Downstream Promoter Element functional range set
(Kutach and Kadonaga, 2000) suggest that these two amon
ESTs may mark the 5' end of the amon
message.
|
While sequencing EMS induced mutations in amon, we identified 19 single nucleotide polymorphisms in amon coding sequences. Table 1 shows polymorphisms between amon genomic sequence (Adams et al., 2000) , an amon cDNA (Siekhaus and Fuller, 1999) , the red e parental chromosome used in our screen (Rayburn et al., in preparation), and two third chromosome balancers (TM3, Sb and TM3, Sb y+) obtained from the Bloomington stock center. Because we sequenced genomic DNA amplified from red e/TM3 heterozygotes, polymorphisms between these chromosomes served as useful positive controls. One of these polymorphisms (a vs. c at position 2110) is predicted to result in a Lysine to Glutamine change at position 562, suggesting that Amon is functional with either Lysine or Glutamine at this position. The remaining 18 polymorphisms are not predicted to result in an amino acid change.
Acknowledgments: This work was supported by an NIH grant (GM53681) to M.B. and an NIH training grant (GM07103) to L.Y.M.R.
References: Adams, M.D., S.E. Celniker, R.A. Holt, C.A. Evans, J.D. Gocayne, et al. 2000, Science. 287: 2185-2195; Kutach, A.K., and J.T. Kadonaga 2000, Mol Cell Biol. 20: 4754-4764; Siekhaus, D.E., and R.S. Fuller 1999, J Neurosci. 19: 6942-6954.
Table 1: Polymorphisms in the coding regions of amon.
|