Nonverbal Communication

2006 Panels & Business Meeting     

 
San Antonio, TX
Schedule in Chronological Order


Innovative Instruction in the Nonverbal Communication Course

Scheduled Time: Thu, Nov 16 - 2:00pm - 3:15pm Building/Room: Convention Center / Room 207 A

Co-sponsor: Instructional Communication

Abstract: Courses in nonverbal communication are becoming more prevalent as either required or elective options for undergraduate and graduate students. This roundtable discussion will provide a forum in which nonverbal teacher/scholars can share innovative methods of instruction that they have developed for their nonverbal communication courses. Approaches to graduate and undergraduate instruction will be discussed, as well as instruction of such “hot” topics as nonverbal communication and technology, privacy management, and the role of nonverbal cues in sexual situations.

  • Innovation in Undergraduate and Graduate Nonverbal Communication Courses *Valerie Manusov (University of Washington)

  • Teaching Nonverbal Skills in Computer-Mediated Communication *Shawn Wahl (Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi)

  • Students Making Connections: Applying Nonverbal Communication Concepts and Theories to Coursework and Life *Karla Jensen (Nebraska Wesleyan University)

  • Nonverbal Communication in the Family: Teaching Privacy Management and Disclosure from a Nonverbal Standpoint *Jack Sargent (Kean University)

  • Delicate Teaching of a ‘Hot’ Topic: Nonverbal Cues in Sexual Situations
    *Diana Ivy (Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi)


Multi-Modal Communication: Gestures, Nonverbal Communication and Alternative Forms for Interacting

Scheduled Time: Thu, Nov 16 - 3:30pm - 4:45pm Building/Room: Convention Center / Mission Room 103 B

Co-Sponsor: Language and Social Interaction Division

Chair: Julien Mirivel (Univ of Arkansas, Little Rock)
Respondent: Mardi Kidwell (Univ of New Hampshire)

  • Building Castles in the Air: The Interactive Process of Gestural Scene Setting. Miriam Sobre (Arizona State University)

  • Coordinated Semantic Integration of Words and Gestures. Jennifer Gerwing (University of Victoria), Meredith Allison (University of Victoria)

  • Osage Native American Church: The Hidden Religion. Steven Pratt (Univ of Central Oklahoma), Merry Buchanan (University of Central Oklahoma)

  • “Say it with music!”: Using the SPEAKING mnemonic as a tool for ethnographic analysis in an alternative learning community. Lauren Benotti Mackenzie (Columbus State University)
     


BUSINESS MEETING

Scheduled Time: Thu, Nov 16 - 6:00pm - 7:30pm  Convention Center, Mission Room 103 A,
(near the keynote address and no-host reception).


New Directions in Detecting and Deterring Deception

Scheduled Time: Fri, Nov 17 - 2:00pm - 3:15pm Building/Room: Hilton/Salon Del Ray North

Respondent: H. Dan O’Hair (Univ of Oklahoma)

Abstract: Human rates for detecting deception are notoriously poor, hovering around 54%. Concerns over detection accuracy have spawned wide-ranging research. Four directions are presented and discussed by this panel of experts. Bond reports results of an experiment testing the potential benefits of detectors having time to investigate another’s claims before making a final judgment of truthfulness. Levine reports results from a cheating experiment and identifies the extent to which the distribution of truthful and deceptive responding affects detection rates. Burgoon discusses and illustrates alternative ways to automate deception detection by using automated linguistic analysis on transcripts and texts, acoustic analysis of audio signals, and computer vision analysis of video features. Blair offers an alternative to detection by presenting an experiment that tests deterrence theory, which posits that people’s likelihood of engaging in deception in the first place can be influenced by certainty of being caught and severity of punishment. O’Hair discusses the overall utility of these various lines of research in advancing understanding of deception and its detection.

  • Investigations of Deceit. Charles F. Bond (Texas Christian University) and Dana Prestwood Gresky, Texas Christian University

  • Recent Findings in Deception Detection. Timothy Levine (Michigan State University)

  • Deterring Deception. J. P. Blair (University of Texas, San Antonio)

  • Increasing Detection Accuracy with Automated Tools. Judee Burgoon (University of Arizona)
     


The Relative Importance of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication: Evidence from Social Psychological Research

Scheduled Time: Sat, Nov 18 - 2:00pm - 3:15pm Building/Room: Hilton / La Duquesa

Local Scholars Panel

Abstract: The findings of the programs of research of James W. Pennebaker and William Ickes converge to suggest that the verbal aspects of communication are somewhat more important, whereas the nonverbal aspects of communication may be somewhat less important, than the bandwagon of nonverbal behavior research that acquired momentum during the 1970s has led people to believe. Pennebaker and Ickes will discuss this evidence and its implications for communication research, and Mark Knapp and Ross Buck will offer their interpretation of and provide commentary on the evidence. This session also continues the nonverbal communication division's commitment to inviting local scholars from our own and other disciplines to participate at NCA.

Participants:

  • William J. Ickes (University of Texas, Arlington)

  • James W. Pennebaker (University of Texas, Austin)

  • Ross Buck (University of Connecticut)

  • Mark Knapp (University of Texas, Austin)


 

 Home

 Participate

 Panels

 Business

 People

 Links

Nonverbal Communication Division
Jointly Located within the National Communication Association

and Universities Everywhere

Send email to: manusov@u.washington.edu

Copyright © 2005;2007. All rights reserved.

Webmaster: chmiller@ou.edu

This Website is