BOT/MICRO/ZOOL 5364
Transmission Electron Microscopy
Fall, 2008

Course Projects and Evaluation

Technical evaluation: Four opportunities will be provided for evaluating the development of technical ability. The first three will consist of submitting negatives displaying a focus and stigmation series using a standard grid provided by the EML. These will be requested during the semester to evaluate student improvement in learning how to produce images on the TEM. The final opportunity for evaluation of technical ability is through evaluating student electron micrographs of standard and project materials, described elsewhere.

The format for the focus and stigmation exercise is given below:

Take a set of three matched negatives showing the same hole in the holey film:

Label the set of negatives with your name and hand it in by October 8, 2008.

Student Project Guidelines: Each student in the course will be required to prepare a course project entailing:

  1. A brief research prospectus (1-2 pages) with a description of the project and methods to be used. This is due Wednesday, October 1, 2008 (at class). A brief progress report will be requested by email at the end of October/beginning of November.
  2. Preparation and observation of a material using TEM.
  3. Including no fewer than 4 transmission electron micrographs (minimum size: 5 x 7") in a poster explaining the research.
  4. Presentation of these results to the class during the regularly scheduled final exam period on December 18, 2008 10:30 am.

Typically, the project will be a sectioned specimen. Project transmission electron micrographs will be graded on the same basis as the standard material, but difficulty of the material may taken into consideration.

Student Project Evaluation: criteria for evaluation will include:

  1. Whether the project answered the questions posed.
  2. Quality of microscopic work (from preparation through printing).
  3. Possible artifacts that may have influenced whether the results obtained answered the questions posed.
  4. Quality and clarity of presentation.

Notes:

Some final comments: