Latino Linkage Council Meeting
February 22, 2002 @ 3:00 pm
Present: Herman
Curiel, Cynthia Tobar, Tim Brittingham, David Barney, Betty Duran, DJ Thompson,
Maria Aymat, Anita Martinez, Ruth Barajas-Mazaheri, Alfonso Redas, Mario
Zamoraon, Madeline Moreno, Sister Elsa, (7-Linkage Council members)
Ruth welcomed members. Advised that today we have a different
agenda that focus on the future work of the council.
Cynthia asked if everyone
had received minutes from last meeting.
Asked group if they had a preference for the language in which the notes
are transcribed. The majority preferred
English? Asked members if there were
any educational materials that they would like to be made available to them that
would aide them to better understand IPV/SV.
One woman said videos backed up with research information.
Cynthia discussed extended
community which consists of providers of IPV/SV services. She asked when the Latino group would like
to include the extended members in the local council meetings. Does group want to continue to identify
barriers and other issues before inviting the extended members? Alfonso asked if they could be told the
purpose of the extended council and what would they do together. Cynthia said that the extended community
members are a requirement of CDC. They
are also providers in OKC who have had some experience in providing services to
IPV/SV victims from the Latino community.
These agencies acknowledge that their agencies have been unable to fully
meet the needs of the Latino population and would like to collaborate with LCDA
to enhance services. The Latino council
will help to identify assets and barriers which will later be shared with
extended group. Ruth said group has lots
of input in stating when and why the extended community is included.
Ruth again raised the issue
of training – does group feel they have all the information they need on
partner violence, if not, then LCDA needs to provide. Process is part of empowering the council. Emphasized that council has lead in
development of the Linkage Council.
Cynthia read a list of
extended community members. Marcia
Smith, Pauline Muskgrove, Jennifer McLaughlin, Sharen Taylor-Wilson, Ann
Lorenz, Margaret Goldman, Larry Rhoades, Cassandra Smith, and Benita
Castillo. These persons have expressed
concern that their agencies do no have bilingual staff and want to work with
the Latino community on enhancing services for IPV/SV. Anita said bilingual staff are definitely needed
to better serve Latinos. Ruth said part
of the process is to hear from the council as to what they see occurring in the
community and what are the identified needs of the community. Sister said a disadvantage is that families
in need of services are confronted with limited resources (i.e., car) and
multiple problems, she felt that such families could benefit from centralized
resources. Cynthia advised that the
funding source has set expectations on how the council develops the information
needed to support service development within the community. Unfortunately this will require some
planning which will delay service implementation. Maria asked “what is the term of funding.” Cynthia said this is a five year grant. Maria asked who would take responsibility
for the services that have been implemented after the five years. Ruth advised that the funding source is
asking the community to demonstrate that there is a need for such services
which is supported through community input by identifying needs, setting
priorities, and providing recommendations.
Once this process have been completed, CDC will allow services to be
implemented. The intent is to establish
services and then look for long-term funding to support independent
continuation of the services to the Latino community. Sister said success is based on community voice in which they can
demonstrate a need in a manner that helps community members. If done properly, then it becomes easier to
obtain future funding. She stated this
is not just a problem for Latinos but for all communities of color. A strength is that we consider ourselves as
a family.
Cynthia introduced Dr.
Herman Curiel of the University of
Oklahoma. Dr. Curiel advised the
council that he has agreed to assist LCDA staff with facilitating the group’s
work. (Fernando Martinez joined group
at this time). Dr. Curiel turned the
meeting over to Dr. Barney. Dr. Barney
reviewed program as outlined by CDC.
Linkage Council will set goals and objectives for council, derive a
definition for partner violence in the community, identify what are the
barriers and issues related to IPV.
When this is completed then CDC and OU will provide some models of
interventions that the council will review to determine what may be the most
culturally appropriate for the community.
As a voice of the community, there is an expectation that council will
work with other providers to enhance their capability to service Latinos. The University is a resource to help LCDA
and the council in setting the research agenda. CDC has mandated that certain things be achieved. The initial effort is to gather information
on IPV. The first effort is to conduct
a resource inventory of OKC of agencies who provide services to individuals and
families dealing with IPV. This will
not only include service description, but agency attitudes and values in
serving Latinos, as well as barriers that they identify. The second is focus groups with community
members to assess values and attitudes toward partner violence. The focus groups will consist of two groups
of women, two of men, one of elderly women, and one of youth. Ruth asked David to explain focus
groups. David said they are small group
discussions with groups of about 8 people who share a common interest about a specific
subject. The group is presented with a
limited number of open ended questions, then the group members reach a
consensus the degree of importance and value of what is identified in their
discussion. The groups are about 90
minutes long and will be conducted in Spanish.
Data is analyzed by using a coding method. Third is key informant interviews that are long interviews with
individuals that will last approximately 2-hours. Plan to interview 10 victims and 5 perpetrators. Also will look at a gender split among the
persons identified. Victims will be 7
females and 3 males. Perpetrators are
mostly male with one or two females. Important
to include both genders within both groups in order to support the need for
services. Ruth said council will be
asked to aide with identifying participants.
All information shared will be totally confidential. Participation is voluntary and participants
will receive an incentive. The findings
will be written up and presented to the council for review. The council will then critic the data
collected from the interviews. The
council will also use information collected from agencies to develop a list of
recommendations. A women asked what
would be their role when participants are identified. Herman said the findings will be shared with the council to be
used in the program planning.
David said one of the first
steps will include reviewing the CDC protocol, most which are very good and
make some recommendation on which interview protocols may need some modifications. Betty advised that when information is
presented to the council, no participant names will be disclosed. Ruth emphasized that confidentiality will be
a responsibility of all the council members.
One woman said she would
like to receive more training and information before proceeding with planning
as a group. Other feedback was that
this education is essential in order to enable members to be more informed
about IPV/SV issues before working with the extended council. Herman said this is a serious issue that
impacts all levels of family, elderly, parents, children and others. Ms. Martinez said that traditional beliefs
of family respect prevents families from speaking out. Sister Elsa also agreed that more
information would be very beneficial in order to better understand the problem
and how to assess information presented to them. Sister spoke of a case in which a parent who confided in her that
she lived with her family in a two story home.
The mother had expressed concern that she had observed her son
masturbating in front of a computer through a slightly open door. The parent felt that the boy should know
better because he had been taught in religion classes that this behavior was
not proper. Parent was concerned with
how this behavior would influence future behavior.
Alfonso said that we should
anticipate that as people participate in groups, needs are going to be raised
such as counseling. Would there be
supports to offer participants. David
said procedures are being set-up to address the needs of victims. Sister asked if participants would need to
give their names when agreeing to focus groups or interviews. David stated that participants may be asked
to give a first name, but that has not been finalized. Betty said university has a responsibility
to provide a referral to a therapist if requested by the participant during the
interview. Herman said interviews can
be anonymous where no name is recorded.
Betty asked if Sister or the council could suggest an alternative
location for the interviews that would be considered safe to the
participants. David said participation
is voluntary in which the participant only answers to those questions they are
comfortable with and that they will be able to leave at any point in the
interview.
Yolanda wanted to know how
information this would be presented to potential participants. She believes that most Latinos are first
generation who are not ready to receive therapy and would require therapy
before they could understand the purpose of focus groups. Ruth said part of the reason we are doing
this is to develop the first step to developing services.
Betty said an informational
flyer will be developed that will describe IPV/SV, state that it is a concern
within the Latino community and in order to gather information to support
service development for Latinos, community members are being asked to
participate in focus groups, as well as interviews with individuals who
identify as victims or individuals that believe they have acted out violence
with family members. The information
will not require names or personal information. Additionally, the flyer should include that information collected
from participants will not be shared with the police, immigration or any other
agencies. The information will be
consolidated into a report which will not identify individuals. Incentives will be provided to
participants.
Alfonso asked who should
take initiative to bring awareness about IPV/SV to the community. David said community would need to take the
lead with the community as well as with service providers. Ruth said training is a key element in
aiding the council to become better prepared in developing approaches to making
the community aware of IPV. Pastor
Zamoron said people do not understand what is domestic violence, therefore it
is important that the council have a clear definition of domestic
violence. It is important to understand
that what is not normal for us may be normal to another. The pastor said that cultural differences
also impact definitions of domestic violence.
Herman time for next
meeting. Ruth said that the group
probably has many issues to address, therefore they may need to determine how
often they would like to meet. Ms.
Martinez said any day is good except Fridays.
Pastor Zamoron suggested every two weeks. He added that he realized this may be perceived as time
consuming, but if council members are committed to this effort, they will make
the time to attend meetings. Sister
advised she is committed to visits at the prison on Thursdays, Wednesday would
be better for her. Ruth suggested that
one meeting be on Wednesday and the other on Thursday. Cynthia suggested the Wednesday meetings
could focus on training and Thursday on council issues. She advised that minutes would be sent out
within the next two weeks.
Alfonso would like to work
on community awareness on domestic violence.
Pastor suggested small ads in Spanish Newspaper or radio stations. Ruth said LCDA will develop some messages
for the council to review that can be posted.
Sister this would also be important to help get information out to
victims. Suggested that these messages
have a contact number where potential victims could call and ultimately
participate in the interviews. Cynthia
said that while increasing awareness, we need to be prepared to have services
available. Next meetings are scheduled
for March 13th and 28th.