
Title: Fracturing Fluid Characterization
Facility
Author: The University of Oklahoma
Sponsor: Gas Research Institute (GRI) and US
Department of Energy (DOE)
Report Period: August 1991 -- December 1992 Annual
Report
Objective: To report and discuss the progress made
during the FFCF project's first full year of research and
development. Technical Hydraulic fracture treatment design
requires a myriad of system parameters.
Technical Perspective: Hydraulic fracture treatment
design requires a myriad of system parameters. Many of these
parameters are inherent properties of the reservoir to be
hydraulically fractured. The fracturing fluid's flow and
particle transport characteristics are important to this
design process. The observations made in this research
facility will closely relate to the flow behavior expected
in an actual hydraulic fracture. These same observations can
also be related to the more routine, practical fluid
characterization techniques used by the industry.
Results: The prototype for a high pressure, high
temperature (i.e., 1200 psig, 250 degrees F, parallel plate flow cell
has been designed and constructed. An instrumentation and
data acquisition system has been assembled that records
temperature, pressure and velocity profiles of the fluid in
the flow cell. A fiber optic based vision system has been
incorporated. This novel system provides a low resolution
optical image of the flow field that can be digitally
recorded and analyzed.
Experimental work has been completed on im-permeable facings
that serve as a replaceable lining for the walls of the flow
cell. These facings are currently being fabricated using an
epoxy resin. This resin system will be used later with an
aggregate of silica particles to fabricate permeable
facings. These permeable facings will be used in the study
of fluid leaking off normal to the main direction of
flow.
Preliminary experimental and numerical studies of fluid flow
are reported. These studies aid in determining the minimum
size requirements for fluid characterization
experiments.
Technical Approach: The reaction frame, or
mechanical body, of the flow cell was designed and
constructed by MTS, one of the project's subcontractors. The
functional requirements for this design were provided by the
entire project group with input from the industry
advisors.
The Electrical Engineering group at OU conceived and
constructed the instrumentation and data acquisition system.
The flow cell itself had to be designed to withstand the
1200 psig maximum working pressure (i.e., 12-MM lb.-force
load). This requires a steel superstructure that inhibits
any of the desired observations. Novel techniques of burying
equi-spaced optical fibers in the facings to obtain a low
resolution optical image of the flow field, imbedded optical
glass windows that facilitate the use of laser-doppler
velocimetry (LDV), and 3-D graphical representation of
measured parameters such as pressure, velocity, and
temperature make it possible to observe and analyze what
would be impossible with conventional instrumentation.
Laboratory experiments and material property measurements
all played a big part in selecting the epoxy resin as a
facing material. Cement was initially thought to be the
material of choice. Although it did exhibit some desirable
physical properties, its mechanical integrity became
uncontrollable as facings were actually fabricated.
Experimental and numerical research into turbulent flow and
fluid leak-off have provided important information for
understanding the application of the prototype. Limitations
based on geometry are identified with these same techniques
so future equipment and experiments for the FFCF can be
designed and planned with clear objectives.
Project Implications: The research and development
that has gone into the FFCF prototype will not only serve as
the foundation for the future of this project but also
provides the industry with valuable insight into some of the
more fundamental aspects of fluid flow in a hydraulic
fracture. These reports form the basis for advancing the
state-of-the-art in rheology research for hydraulic
fracturing.
Report Contents:
|
1.Introduction |
10 |
|
Goals of the FFCF Project |
10 |
|
Brief Description of the Proposed FFCF |
11 |
|
The Flow Cell |
11 |
|
Auxiliary Equipment |
12 |
|
Instrumentation |
12 |
|
Research and Development Plan for FFCF Prototype |
15 |
|
Summary of Accomplishments |
22 |
|
Analysis of Leak-off in Laminar Flow through a Porous Channel - Part I |
22 |
|
Analysis of Leak-off in Laminar Flow through a Porous Channel - Part II |
22 |
|
Heating FFCF Fluids by Heat Transfer from Warm Slot Walls |
22 |
|
A Practical Phenomenology for Turbulent Jets of Polymer Solutions Discharged into Slots |
23 |
|
An experimental Investigation of Jet Penetration into a Slot |
24 |
|
Micro - Gas Permeameter |
24 |
|
Evaluation of Cement as a facing Material |
24 |
|
Data Acquisition and Control System for the FFCF Project |
25 |
|
Halliburton Services |
26 |
|
RE/SPEC Incorporated |
27 |
|
MTS Systems Corporation |
28 |
|
Summary of Additional Studies at OU |
28 |
|
Viscoelastic Models |
28 |
|
Viscoelastic Behavior of Hydroxypropyl Guar (HPG) |
31 |
|
Retarded-Motion Expansion |
31 |
|
Thin Domain Analysis |
32 |
|
Miscellaneous Numerical Modeling in Progress |
32 |
|
Bibliography |
34 |
|
2. Analysis of Leak-off in Laminar Flow through a Porous Channel - Part I |
37 |
|
Introduction |
37 |
|
Problem Statement |
37 |
|
Numerical Analysis |
39 |
|
Discussions and Conclusions |
43 |
|
Bibliography |
44 |
|
3. Analysis of Leak-off in Laminar Flow through a Porous Channel - Part II |
47 |
|
Introduction |
47 |
|
Problem Statement |
47 |
|
Numerical Analysis |
50 |
|
Finite Difference Approximations |
50 |
|
Numerical Results |
51 |
|
Discussions and Conclusions |
52 |
|
Bibliography |
52 |
|
4. Heating FFCF Fluids by Heat Transfer from Warm Slot Walls |
54 |
|
Introduction |
54 |
|
The Analytic Solution |
54 |
|
Numerical Solutions |
55 |
|
Conclusions |
59 |
|
Nomenclature |
60 |
|
5. A Practical Phenomenology for Turbulent Jets of Polymer Solutions Discharged into Slots |
61 |
|
Introduction |
61 |
|
Formulation of the Problem |
62 |
|
Semi-Analytical Analysis |
64 |
|
Outline |
64 |
|
Preliminary Goals |
64 |
|
Basic Phenomenology |
65 |
|
Basic Assumption |
65 |
|
Models |
65 |
|
Dynamical Equations |
65 |
|
Prandtl's Mixing-Length Theory |
67 |
|
Von Karman's Similarity Hypothesis |
68 |
|
Velocity Profile |
68 |
|
Turbulent Spread of the Mixing Zone I |
70 |
|
Pressure Gradient |
73 |
|
Mass and Momentum Integrals |
74 |
|
Forward Mass Flux and Turbulent Penetration Length |
75 |
|
Turbulent Spread of the Mixing Zone II |
76 |
|
Forward Mass Flux and Velocities Results |
80 |
|
Turbulent Penetration Length Results |
88 |
|
Conclusions |
91 |
|
Bibliography |
91 |
|
6. An Experimental Investigation of Jet Penetration into a Slot |
93 |
|
Introduction |
93 |
|
Equipment |
94 |
|
Slot Design |
94 |
|
Support Equipment |
95 |
|
The Fluids Tested |
95 |
|
Reynolds Number for a Power Law Fluid |
97 |
|
Results |
98 |
|
Correlation |
98 |
|
Estimation Penetration Lengths |
105 |
|
Conclusions |
105 |
|
Bibliography |
106 |
|
7. Micro - Gas Permeameter |
107 |
|
Introduction |
107 |
|
Description |
108 |
|
Theory |
108 |
|
Operation |
109 |
|
Equipment List |
110 |
|
Calibration Procedure |
111 |
|
Permeability Computations |
115 |
|
8. Evaluation of Cement as a Facing Material |
117 |
|
Introduction |
117 |
|
Chemistry of Portland Cement |
118 |
|
Materials Used |
119 |
|
Sample Preparation Procedures |
120 |
|
Mixing the Cement Slurry |
120 |
|
Casting and Setting the Cement Slurry |
120 |
|
Preparation of Core Plugs for Testing |
120 |
|
Permeability Measurements |
121 |
|
Cement Physical Properties |
121 |
|
Permeability |
121 |
|
Porosity |
124 |
|
Uniaxial and Triaxial Compressive Tests |
124 |
|
Beam Tests - Tensile Strength |
128 |
|
Evaluation of Fluid Loss Characteristics in Cement Facings for FFCF |
131 |
|
Water Extraction (Leaching) Tests on Set Cement |
134 |
|
Results of Final Preparations of Facings |
134 |
|
Conclusions |
137 |
|
Bibliography |
139 |
|
9. Data Acquisition and Control System for FFCF Project |
140 |
|
Statement of the Problem |
140 |
|
Laser Doppler Velocity (LDV) Measurements |
140 |
|
Fiber Optic Pressure Transducers |
142 |
|
Temperature Measurements |
142 |
|
Fiber Optic Vision System |
146 |
|
Data Acquisition |
147 |
|
Performance Criteria |
147 |
|
Benchmarks |
148 |
|
10. Halliburton Services |
150 |
|
Introduction |
150 |
|
Overall Project Objective |
150 |
|
Summary of Previous Work Performed in February 1991 to September1991 |
150 |
|
Objectives for October 1991 to September1992 |
151 |
|
Work Plan for October 1991 to September 1992 |
151 |
|
Work Completed During October 1991 to September 1992 |
152 |
|
Activity Plan for Verification Testing - Phase I |
156 |
|
Description of Equipment |
157 |
|
Test Matrix |
159 |
|
Activity Plans for Verification Testing - Phase II |
168 |
|
Research and Development Plans for FFCF Prototype |
172 |
|
Fluid Behavior |
172 |
|
Proppant Transport |
180 |
|
Fluid Leak-off |
185 |
|
Summary and Conclusion |
191 |
|
11. RE/SPEC Incorporated |
192 |
|
Introduction |
192 |
|
Numerical Studies |
192 |
|
Quality Assurance |
197 |
|
Related Activities |
199 |
|
Bibliography |
200 |
|
12. MTS Systems Corporation |
201 |
|
Introduction |
201 |
|
Overall Project Objective |
201 |
|
Summary of Previous Work |
201 |
|
Specific Objectives |
202 |
|
Work Plan for the Current Year |
202 |
|
Work Actually Performed |
203 |
|
Major Achievements |
204 |
|
Major Technical Problems |
204 |
|
Seal Test Report |
205 |
|
Initial One Hole Seal Tests |
205 |
|
One Hole Seal Tests at High Temperature |
208 |
|
|
|
|