
Title: Fracturing Fluid Characterization
Facility
Author: The University of Oklahoma
Sponsor: Gas Research Institute (GRI) and US
Department of Energy (DOE)
Report Period: January -- December 1993 Annual
Report
Objective: To report and discuss the progress made
during the FFCF project's 1993 calendar year.
Technical Perspective: Hydraulic fracture
treatment design requires a myriad of system parameters.
Many of these parameters are inherent properties of the
reservoir to be hydraulically fractured. The fracturing
fluid's flow and particle transport characteristics are
important to this design process. The observations made on
this research facility will closely relate to the flow
behavior expected in an actual hydraulic fracture. These
same observations can also be related to the more routine,
practical fluid characterization techniques used by the
industry.
Results: A high-pressure, high temperature (i.e.,
1200 psig, 250 degrees F, parallel plate flow cell has been designed
and constructed. An instrumentation and data acquisition
system has been assembled that records temperature, pressure
and velocity profiles of the fluid in flow cell. A fiber
optic based vision system had been incorporated. This novel
system provides a low-resolution optical image of the flow
field that can be digitally recorded, analyzed, and maps
generated to depict proppant concentration as a function of
space and time.
Experimental work was completed on impermeable facings that
serve as a replaceable lining for the walls of the flow
cell. These facing are currently being fabricated using sand
and as epoxy resin as a bonding agent. The resin system is
also used with an aggregate of silica particles to fabricate
permeable facings. These permeable facings will be used in
the study of fluid leaking off normal to the main direction
of flow.
Experimental and numerical studies of fluid flow are
reported. These studies aided in determining the minimum
size requirements for fluid characterization experiments. In
addition, the flow experiments coupled with analytical
studies permitted the determination of the physical size of
a much larger low-pressure flow apparatus necessary to
adequately characterize the proppant transport properties of
complex fracturing fluids.
Technical Approach: The reaction frame, or
mechanical body, of the flow cell was designed and
constructed by MTS, one of the project's subcontractors. The
functional requirements for this design were provided by the
entire project group with input from the industry
advisors.
The Electrical Engineering group at OU conceived and
constructed the instrumentation and data acquisition system.
The high-pressure simulator (HPS) was designed to operate at
a maximum pressure of 1200 psig (i.e., 12 MM lb.-force
load). This required a steel superstructure that inhibits
any of the desired observations. Novel techniques of burying
equi-spaced optical fibers in the facings to obtain a low
resolution optical image of the flow field, imbedded optical
glass windows that facilitate the use of the Laser Doppler
Velocimetry (LDV), and 3-D graphical representation of
measured parameters such as pressure, velocity, and
temperature make it possible to observe and analyze what
would be impossible with conventional instrumentation.
Laboratory experiments and material property measurements
all played a big part in selecting the epoxy resin as a
facing material. Cement was initially thought to be the
material of choice. Although it did exhibit some desirable
physical properties, its mechanical integrity became
uncontrollable as facings were actually fabricated.
Experimental and numerical research into turbulent flow and
fluid leak-off have provided important information for
understanding the application of the prototype. Limitations
based on geometry are identified with these same techniques
so future equipment and experiments for the FFCF can be
designed and planned with clear objectives.
Project Implications: The research and development
that has gone into the FFCF prototype will not only serve as
the foundation for the future of this project but also
provides the industry with valuable insight into some of the
more fundamental aspects of fluid flow in a hydraulic
fracture. These reports form the basis for advancing the
state of the art in rheology research for hydraulic
fracturing.
Report Contents:
|
GRI Report: GRI 94/0065 | |
|
1.Introduction |
1 |
|
Goals of the FFCF Project |
1 |
|
Brief Description of the FFCF |
2 |
|
The Flow Cell |
2 |
|
Auxiliary Equipment |
4 |
|
Instrumentation |
4 |
|
Research and Development Plan for FFCF Prototype |
6 |
|
2. Low Pressure, Large Scale FFCF Functional Requirements and Design Concepts |
8 |
|
MTS Research Activity Summary |
8 |
|
Objectives of the Low Pressure Fracture Simulator (LPS) |
8 |
|
Functional Requirements |
9 |
|
Proposed LPS Structural Specification |
17 |
|
Discussion of Specification |
18 |
|
3. Instrumentation and Data Acquisition for Fracturing Fluid Flow Measurement |
24 |
|
Introduction |
24 |
|
Data Acquisition and Visualization |
24 |
|
Vision System |
26 |
|
Laser Doppler Velociemetry Measurements |
28 |
|
Particle Tracking |
35 |
|
4. Operational Procedures for the FFCF High Pressure Simulator |
37 |
|
Introduction |
37 |
|
Fabrication and Installation of Facings |
37 |
|
Facings Fabrication |
37 |
|
Facing Installation |
38 |
|
Operation of the MTS Hardware |
39 |
|
Opening and Closing Procedures for the HPS |
39 |
|
Operation of the MTS Control System |
40 |
|
Operation of the Data Acquisition System |
40 |
|
Honeywell Differential Pressure Transmitters |
40 |
|
LDV System |
42 |
|
Temperature System |
42 |
|
Vision System |
42 |
|
Other Data Acquisition Computers |
42 |
|
5. Tests Results from the High Pressure Simulator |
43 |
|
Introduction |
43 |
|
Data Analysis |
48 |
|
Verification Tests |
51 |
|
Research Tests |
62 |
|
Conclusions |
74 |
|
6. Proppant Transport Modeling |
77 |
|
Basics of Multiphase Mixture Theory |
77 |
|
Continuum Theory, Corpuscular Theory, and Averaging Theory |
77 |
|
Notation |
78 |
|
Mathematical Structure |
79 |
|
Balance Principles for Constituents |
80 |
|
Balance Principles for the Mixture |
80 |
|
Constitutive Equations |
81 |
|
Restrictions on Constitutive Equations |
82 |
|
Determinism of the System Equations |
82 |
|
Boundary Value Problems |
83 |
|
Conclusion |
83 |
|
Relation of Microstructure to Constitutive Equations |
83 |
|
Introduction |
83 |
|
General Equations for Two-Phase Flow |
85 |
|
Some Assumptions in Modeling Proppant Flows |
89 |
|
Hyperbolicity Analysis of the Equations |
96 |
|
An Application to Wedge Shape Fracture |
98 |
|
Numerical Stability Consideration |
99 |
|
Dilute Proppant Transfer |
102 |
|
Introduction |
102 |
|
Motion Equations |
103 |
|
Constitutive Equations |
106 |
|
Channel Flow |
110 |
|
Approximate Analytical Solutions |
111 |
|
Numerical Solutions |
114 |
|
Dense Proppant Transfer |
118 |
|
Kinematics and Equations of Balance |
118 |
|
Constitutive Equations |
121 |
|
Field Equations |
123 |
|
Proppant Segregation in Poiseuille Flow |
127 |
|
Numerical Results |
128 |
|
Conclusion |
131 |
|
7. Other Accomplishments Achieved During 1993 |
133 |
|
8. Proposed Work Plan for 1994 and Beyond |
134 |
|
Introduction |
134 |
|
Design, Fabrication, and Installation of a Low Pressure Simulator (LPS) |
134 |
|
Design, Fabrication and Installation of the Computational Hardware, Instrumentation, and Data Acquisition Hardware and Software for the Low Pressure Simulator |
137
|
|
Rheological and Proppant Transport Research Using the HPS |
138 |
|
Convective Settling and Encapsulation Studies |
139 |
|
Dynamic Fluid Loss Studies and Correlation with Laboratory Scale Experiments |
139 |
|
Characterization of Crosslinked Fluid and Crosslinked Slurry Rheology |
139 |
|
Investigation of Flow through Perforations |
140 |
|
Preparation of a Verification Test Plan for the LPS |
140 |
|
Development of a Strategy/Plan for Soliciting Future Support for the FFCF Project |
140 |
|
FFCF Building Construction |
141 |
|
Development of a Systematic Plan for Relocating the HPS to the New FFCF Building |
141 |
|
Verification and Testing LPS |
141 |
|
Summary |
142 |
|
|
|
|