
Title: Fracturing Fluid Characterization
Facility
Author: The University of Oklahoma
Sponsor: Gas Research Institute (GRI) and US
Department of Energy (DOE)
Report Period: January -- December 1996 Annual
Report
Objective: To report and discuss the progress made on
the FFCF Project during the 1996 calendar year.
Technical Perspective: The petroleum industry has
used hydraulic fracturing techniques to stimulate low and
high permeability oil and gas reservoirs to enhance their
potential recoveries. Nevertheless, the design and
implementation of a scientifically and economically sound
fracturing job, due to the lack of knowledge of rheological
behavior of hydraulic fracturing fluids under field
conditions, remains a challenge. Furthermore, the current
level of technical knowledge with research institutes,
service companies, and operators does not translate to field
applications. One of the principle reasons for this
technology gap, is the lack of understanding of the
rheological behavior of hydraulic fracturing fluids under
field conditions, which primarily relates to the limitations
in scaling down the field conditions to the laboratory. This
necessitates a need for a comprehensive investigation of
these fluids under downhole conditions. The Fracturing Fluid
Characterization Facility (FFCF), a field scale simulator
was, therefore proposed with the intent of providing the
industry with a better understanding of the behavior of
these fracturing fluids and their proppant transport
characteristics under downhole fracture conditions. The High
Pressure Simulator (HPS) simulates, to the maximum degree
practical, all conditions experienced by a fracturing fluid
from its formation on the surface, down the wellbore,
through perforations, into the fracture, and its leakage
into the rock formation. Together with the onsite auxiliary
equipment, such as mixing and pumping system,
pre-conditioning system, data acquisition system, and
rheology measuring system, the HPS is the most advance
fracture simulator available to conduct research, mimicking
field conditions, in the areas such as: rheological
characterization of fracturing fluids, proppant transport
simulations, proppant transport measurements, perforation
pressure loss, coiled tubing friction loss, dynamic fluid
loss, and heat transfer characterization of polymer
solutions and gels.
Results: During 1996, research efforts were focused
on the rheological characterization of fracturing fluids,
perforation pressure loss study, dynamic fluid loss study,
tubular friction loss study, heat transfer characterization
of polymer solutions and gels, and proppant transport
simulation. The HPS along with the onsite auxiliary
equipment, was utilized to perform various tests. Efforts
were also made to effectively transfer the research findings
to industry via technical publications, presentations,
newsletters, short courses, and seminars. A Coiled Tubing
Consortium was initiated to conduct research in the areas
related to the application of coiled tubing. In addition, a
marketing strategy was prepared to conduct third party
testing. Following are the key results obtained in various
research areas during 1996.
On the Rheology: Rheological characterization studies of the selected fracturing fluids show that, an optimum crosslinked gel formation characterized by a shear history independent, maximum viscosity is found to exist at a particular pH value for each temperature investigated between shear rates ranging from 20 to 200 sec --1. Also, the maximum viscosities obtained for the various temperatures at the optimum fluid formulation are found to be approximately the same for shear rates considered. In addition, for those pH values at which the gels were shear history dependent, the rheological changes were more predominant in the first minute of test.
On the Perforation Pressure Loss: Comprehensive investigation of pressure loss across perforations led to development of new correlations for perforation pressure loss to provide the coefficient of discharge for linear polymer solutions, titanium/borate-crosslinked gels, and linear slurries prepared with 20/40 mesh sand. Also, the change in the coefficient of discharge due to perforation erosion is found to be a complex function of sand size, sand concentration, perforation diameter, carrier fluid viscosity, flow rate, and pumping time.
On the Dynamic Fluid Loss: The study shows that surface roughness is a major factor in filter cake development. It also indicates that filter cake development is not a requirement for fluid loss control. Further study of fluid loss shows that for linear fluids, fluid loss follows a linear relationship with square-root-of-time, while the fluid loss for crosslinked fluids, shows a departure from this behavior with the time of departure depending on the permeability. Also, increasing the gel concentration enhances fluid loss control and addition of silica flour enhances fluid loss control, however, increasing the concentration provides no further enhancement.
On the Tubular Friction Loss: Research results show that for water, the tubing seam decreases the frictional pressure loss whereas coiled tubing curvature increases the friction pressure drop with magnitude of the effect of curvature being much greater than that of the seam. Moreover, while the tubing seam does not seem to have any effects on frictional pressure loss for the linear solutions, the curvature of the coiled tubing strongly affects the pressure drop. When crosslinked fluid is used, the study for borate-crosslinked gels shows that the frictional pressure loss is a strong function of pH and shear history.
On the Heat Transfer: The overall heat transfer coefficient for borate-crosslinked 35lb/Mgal Guar gel, ranges from 70 and 85 Btu/((F hr ft Ó) shear histories up to 3000 ft. Heat transfer coefficient for linear and crosslinked gels are found to be lower than those of water. The overall heat transfer coefficients for the borate crosslinked Guar are shown to be independent of crosslinker flow rate between 300 and 450 ml/min. The overall heat transfer coefficients, due to a higher degree of crosslinking, is shown to depend on crosslinker flow rates between 450 and 500 ml/min.
Technical Approach: The major goals of the project
were to develop a fracture simulator that provides an
accurate rheological characterization of hydraulic
fracturing fluids under field conditions, and to provide a
permanent facility that could be used for testing purposes.
To accomplish these tasks, an effective technical program
was developed to utilize the HPS to its maximum
capabilities. This program was based on industry research
needs in areas such as proppant transport, foam fluid
characterization, and coiled tubing applications.
Accordingly, a Coiled Tubing Consortium was initiated and a
technical program developed to make the facility available
to the industry in the form of Third Party Testing. In
addition, the operational status of the vision system, where
proppant transportation can be visualized, was the subject
of concern during 1996. Accordingly, extensive analyses were
performed on data obtained from a set of sand slurry tests.
The improved image definition has been characterized and a
calibration curve of sand concentration levels in graphical
form.
Project Implications: The major research areas during
1996, to constitute important deliverables are in the areas
of borate-crosslinked gel rheology, perforation pressure
losses, dynamic fluid loss, coiled tubing friction losses,
heat transfer characteristics of polymer solutions, the use
of laser doppler velocimetry as a tool for accurate
rheological characterization, and proppant transport studies
with the aid of a suitable vision system. Through an
effective approach, the 1996 research findings were
transferred to the industry. In addition, the developed
perforation correlation, has been implemented into computer
fracturing simulators and the coiled tubing correlation,
once revised, will be implemented into computer simulators
software. Additional plans in terms of verification and
technology transfer activities in these areas are under
investigations.
Report Contents:
|
GRI Report: GRI |
|
|
97/0050 |
|
|
1. Introduction |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
The FFCF Project |
1 |
|
The High Pressure Simulator |
2 |
|
Auxiliary Equipment and Instrumentation |
2 |
|
Major Research Areas and Transfer of Past Research Results |
4 |
|
Implications Research Results |
7 |
|
Project Goals for 1997 and Beyond |
8 |
|
2. Capabilities |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
Mixing and Pumping System |
1 |
|
Fluid Preconditioning System |
4 |
|
Data Acquisition System |
4 |
|
Rheology Measuring System |
9 |
|
The New Facility |
11 |
|
3. Rheology |
1 |
|
Slot Rheology |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Data Analysis |
2 |
|
Equipment and Procedure |
3 |
|
Results and Discussion |
3 |
|
Impacts and Benefits |
15 |
|
Conclusions |
16 |
|
Laboratory Rheology |
17 |
|
Synopsis |
17 |
|
Introduction |
17 |
|
Theory |
17 |
|
Equipment and Procedure |
18 |
|
Results and Discussions |
21 |
|
Conclusions |
39 |
|
4. Perforation Pressure Loss |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Data Analysis |
2 |
|
Equipment and Procedure |
6 |
|
Results and Discussions |
7 |
|
Conclusions |
15 |
|
5. Dynamic Fluid Loss |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Dynamic Fluid Loss Studies on the HPS |
1 |
|
Procedure |
1 |
|
Results and Discussion |
2 |
|
Comparisons of the Lab and HPS Results |
12 |
|
Control Mechanisms |
13 |
|
Conclusions |
14 |
|
6. Tubular Friction Loss |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Equipment and Procedure |
2 |
|
Results and Discussion |
4 |
|
Impacts and Benefits |
14 |
|
Conclusions |
15 |
|
7. Heat Transfer |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Equipment and Procedure |
2 |
|
Results and Discussion |
3 |
|
Conclusions |
7 |
|
8. Laser Doppler Velocimetry |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Equipment and Procedure |
1 |
|
Results and Discussion |
3 |
|
Velocity Profiles Using Modification in Wall Location Procedures |
3 |
|
Velocity Profiles for HPG |
5 |
|
Velocity Profiles for Guar |
12 |
|
Gradient - Broadening Error |
15 |
|
Accuracy of LDV Measurements |
17 |
|
Conclusions |
17 |
|
9. Proppant Transport Simulation |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Theory |
1 |
|
The Analysis of images Acquired using Light Emitted Diodes as a Light Source |
1 |
|
LED Facings |
5 |
|
Description of Vision System's New Equipment |
5 |
|
Justification for New Systems Equipment |
6 |
|
Future Considerations |
7 |
|
10. Technology Transfer |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Technology Transfer |
2 |
|
Technical Articles |
2 |
|
Technical Publications/Presentations |
4 |
|
Short Course |
6 |
|
Consortium Funded Research |
6 |
|
Third Party Testing |
6 |
|
MS Theses and Ph.D. Dissertations |
7 |
|
Other Means of Transferring Technology |
7 |
|
Summary of Research Findings |
7 |
|
Summary of Future Activities |
7 |
|
11. Proposed Work Plan for 1996 and Beyond |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
Verification and Transfer of Past Research Results |
1 |
|
Instrumentation Status |
2 |
|
Research Focus |
2 |
|
Consortium Funded Research |
4 |
|
Testing for Clients (Third Party Testing) |
5 |
|
Field Verification |
6 |
|
Technology Transfer |
6 |
|
|
|
|