
Title: Fracturing Fluid Characterization
Facility
Author: The University of Oklahoma
Sponsor: Gas Research Institute (GRI) and US
Department of Energy (DOE)
Report Period: January -- December 1997 Annual
Report
Objective: To report and discuss the progress made on
the FFCF Project during the 1997 calendar year.
Technical Perspective: The hydraulic fracturing
technique has emerged as an effective method for
stimulating oil and gas wells over the past few decades.
The proper design of an optimum fracturing treatment
involves knowledge of formation stresses, fracturing
fluid characteristics and the interaction between the
formation and the fluid. Recent technological advances
have paved the way to improve the design of such treatments
since its implementation in the middle of this century.
However, the accurate prediction of the behavior of complex
fracturing fluids in existence today under downhole conditions
has still not been realized. The Fracturing Fluid
Characterization Facility (FFCF) is established in order to
provide the Petroleum Industry with a comprehensive, research
based organization, whose primary objective is to provide
valuable insight into the various mechanisms that govern the
flow of fracturing fluids and slurries through a hydraulically
created fracture. In this regard, a unique above-the-ground
fracture simulator is designed and constructed at the FFCF,
labeled "The High Pressure Simulator" (HPS). The HPS is
a vertical, variable-width, parallel plate flow apparatus
capable of operating at high temperatures (up to 250°F) and
pressures (up to 1200 psi). The HPS, in conjunction with
auxiliary field equipment, has enabled the replication,
to the maximum degree practical, the various processes a
fracturing fluid undergoes starting from its preparation on
the surface and pumping down the well to its subsequent
flowback from the created fracture. The HPS is the most
advanced fracture simulator currently available to the industry.
Some of its key experimental research areas include
fracturing fluid characterization, wall slippage phenomena,
dynamic fluid loss, perforation pressure loss, proppant
convection and encapsulation and proppant flowback for a
variety of fracturing fluids (both linear and crosslinked),
slurries and foams. The FFCF is also equipped with a
state-of-the-art laboratory, where fracturing fluid characterization
is performed on a laboratory scale and can be used to
compare with the HPS and industry generated results.
Results: In accordance with the research areas
identified by the industry, during 1997 the FFCF
concentrated its research efforts on investigation
of proppant transport, foam fluid studies, fracturing
fluid rheology, perforation pressure loss, proppant
flowback feasibility studies, and coiled tubing
friction losses. In addition, a host of specialized
third party testing for clients was also conducted.
Efforts were also made to effectively transfer the
research findings to industry via technical publications
and presentations. Extensive efforts were also devoted
to meet the objectives set forth for the joint industry
"Coiled Tubing Consortium." Following are the key
results obtained in various research areas.
On the Proppant Transport: The primary
objective of the tests devoted to the investigation
of proppant transport involved the study of various
phenomena governing the settling of proppants, in a
fracturing fluid medium inside the HPS, such as
convection and encapsulation under dynamic settling
conditions. A vision system capable of monitoring
the proppant concentration as well as visualization
of the proppant movement and bed formation inside
the HPS as a function of time is utilized. It is
found that the convection is a density-driven
mechanism and in low viscous medium, it dominates
proppant settling. Increasing viscosity of the
lower medium inhibits encapsulation.
On the Foam Fluid Studies: The objective of
foam fluid testing is to characterize the rheology
of various foam fluids as well as to evaluate their
proppant carrying abilities. Foams are increasingly
used in stimulation treatments primarily due to their
increased proppant carrying capacity, low fluid loss
characteristics, and the ability to achieve high flow
rates. A limited number of feasibility tests were
conducted on aqueous foam and linear gel foams on the
HPS. The results were compared with that of those
published earlier. In addition, the design and
construction of a foam flow loop is currently underway
for rheological characterization of aqueous and nitrogen
foams so as to offer a comparison with HPS generated data.
On the Borate-Crosslinked Gel Rheology: Studies
were conducted on borate-crosslinked fracturing
fluids to determine an optimum crosslinker concentration
that can be utilized to maximize the economics of
a fracturing treatment. Moreover, wall slip studies
were also conducted on these gels to further the
understanding on borate-crosslinked gels. The
crosslinking mechanism is a time-dependent process
that involves the breaking and re-healing of bonds at
what is termed crosslinking sites (points). This poses
a problem in proper characterization of such crosslinked
fluid systems. Efforts are being made to accurately
predict the behavior of these fluid systems under
representative downhole conditions.
On the Perforation Pressure Loss: Accurate
prediction of perforation pressure loss is very
important in limited-entry hydraulic fracturing
treatments. Unfortunately the same governing
equation used in the orifice equation has been
utilized in the Petroleum Industry to calculate
perforation pressure losses. This often leads to
erroneous quantification of pressure measurements.
In this regard, simple easy-to-use correlations
were developed for linear and crosslinked fluids
and slurries for calculating perforation pressure
losses as a function of various fluid and proppant
properties.
On the Proppant Flowback Studies: Proppant
flowback following hydraulic fracture stimulation
has been a major source of production impairment
for oil and gas wells. Wellbore plugging, equipment
erosion, and lost fracture conductivity (resulting
in production decrease) are some of the other
problems associated with proppant flowback. Most
sand control methods are effective only for
specific time periods and require a large amount of
manpower and equipment, dramatically increasing
operating costs.
The Fracturing Fluid Characterization Facility
has the unique capability of testing fluids and
slurries at downhole temperatures and pressures
in a large-scale environment using a High Pressure
Simulator. The width of the fracture provided by
the HPS can be varied during the test just like
fractures in reservoirs during treatment. The
preliminary studies on proppant flowback performed
at FFCF have established the feasibility of
conducting proppant flowback studies at the
facility. The potential economic impact of being
able to eliminate or diminish proppant flowback is
significant and has immediate application.
On the Consortium Funded Research: As a
part of ongoing efforts to attract potential
clients and funding, the Coiled Tubing Consortium
was established in order to determine the
frictional pressure losses through coiled tubing
for a variety of fracturing and drilling fluids
through various diameter pipes. A test matrix was
designed in collaboration with the consortium
members and numerous tests were successfully
conducted. The results of Phase I were presented
at the Coiled Tubing Consortium Meeting. In
addition, as mentioned previously, the proppant
flowback consortium is currently in the process of
being established.
On the Third Party Testing: The FFCF has
successfully attracted several clients in
performing specific tests that address their
needs and concerns. A comprehensive list of all
the companies and organizations that have used
the services of the FFCF is presented in the
report.
On the Technology Transfer: The purpose
of technology transfer is to convey the various
research results generated at the FFCF to a
user-friendly form that can be utilized readily
by the industry. This involves conducting
surveys to identify major research areas,
transferring information and data that can be
applied directly by the industry, and to attract
potential clients to generate funding as well as
to provide tailor made solutions to their specific
problems. A detailed account of the technology
transfer activities at the FFCF is provided in
the report.
Technical Approach: The major goals of
the project were to develop a fracture
simulator that provides an accurate rheological
characterization of hydraulic fracturing fluids
under field conditions and to provide a
permanent facility that could be used for testing
purposes. To accomplish these tasks, an effective
technical program was developed to utilize the HPS
to its maximum capabilities. This program was
based on industry research needs in areas such as
proppant transport, foam fluid characterization,
and coiled tubing applications. Accordingly, a
Coiled Tubing Consortium was initiated and a
technical program was developed to make the facility
available to the industry in the form of Third
Party Testing. Extensive analyses were performed
on data obtained from a set of sand slurry tests.
The improved image definition was characterized
and a calibration curve of sand concentration as
a function of light transmission level was
obtained. As a result, the vision system was
able to assist in presenting sand concentration
levels in graphical form during proppant
transport tests.
Project Implications: An analysis of
proppant transport data collected with polymer
solutions in the HPS has revealed new
information concerning the mechanisms of
sedimentation in these non-Newtonian fluids.
This information will form the basis of new
proppant transport models that can be
incorporated into the fracture design simulators.
Preliminary foam rheology experiments performed
in the HPS are the industry's first attempt to
measure foam properties in a large-scale
apparatus which simulates the geometry of a
hydraulic fracture. Since foam fracturing
comprises approximately 30% of the hydraulic
fracturing market, it is important that the
industry understand as much as possible about
the properties of these unique fluids.
New perforation pressure correlations allow
one to predict the perforation frictional loss
accurately as well as characterize near-wellbore
tortuosity. The design of future well completions
and stimulation treatments will benefit from this
knowledge.
The economic consequences of proppant flowback
are enormous. Costly downtime can ensue with
a loss in revenue from sales while expensive
repairs are being made to the production
equipment. The results obtained from the
feasibility study at the FFCF and subsequent
test results will aid in understanding the
various mechanisms for proppant flowback after
the hydraulic fracturing treatment.
GRI Project Manager
Brian C. Gahan
Report Contents:
|
GRI Report: GRI |
|
|
98/0235 |
|
|
1. Introduction |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
The FFCF Project |
1 |
|
The High Pressure Simulator |
2 |
|
Auxiliary Equipment and Instrumentation |
3 |
|
Major Research Areas and Transfer of Past Research Results |
3 |
|
Implications Research Results |
5 |
|
2. Capabilities |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
Mixing and Pumping System |
1 |
|
Fluid Preconditioning System |
2 |
|
Data Acquisition System |
2 |
|
Rheology Measuring System |
3 |
|
The Facility |
3 |
|
Equipment Acquisitions and Upgrades |
3 |
|
3. Prpppant Transport |
1 |
|
Objective |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Experimental Procedure |
2 |
|
Discussion |
5 |
|
Conclusions |
9 |
|
4. Foam Fluids |
1 |
|
Objective |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Experimental Set-up and Procedure |
2 |
|
Results and Discussions |
3 |
|
5. Rheology |
1 |
|
Objective |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Fluid Formatiom Procedure |
2 |
|
Data Analysis |
3 |
|
Results and Discussion |
5 |
|
Conclusions |
13 |
|
6. Perforation Pressure Loss |
1 |
|
Objective |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Experimental |
2 |
|
Method of Data Analysis |
5 |
|
Results and Discussion |
7 |
|
Case Study Verification of Correlation |
17 |
|
Conclusions |
23 |
|
7. Proppant Flowback |
1 |
|
Objective |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Experimental Setup |
2 |
|
Results and Discussion |
4 |
|
Conclusions |
8 |
|
8. Consortium Funded Research |
1 |
|
Objective |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Coiled Tubing Applications |
1 |
|
Proppant Flowback |
1 |
|
9. Third Party Testing |
1 |
|
Objective |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Third Party Testing Efforts |
1 |
|
Future Efforts |
2 |
|
10. Technology Transfer |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Technology Transfer |
1 |
|
Technical Articles |
2 |
|
Technical Publications/Presentations |
2 |
|
MS Theses and Ph.D. Dissertations |
4 |
|
Other Means of Transferring Technology |
4 |
|
11. Proposed Work Plan for 1998 and Beyond |
1 |
|
Synopsis |
1 |
|
Introduction |
1 |
|
Statement of Work |
2 |
|
Research Focus |
3 |
|
|
|
|