Syllabus

EIPT 6513    Fall 2001


Dr. Amy C. Bradshaw
Office:  Collings 320B
Hours: Wednesday 2:30-4:30
Phone: 325-1530
e-mail: bradshaw@ou.edu


Overview

Text & Materials

Projects

Grading

Schedule



 

Course Overview

This course involves learning about, from, and with computers. During the semester we will explore the role and potential of emerging technologies, and the praxis of technology and contemporary learning theory. The goal is not only to learn how to use various software programs and technologies, but also to develop critical thinking skills in regard to how we use technologies and how our uses impact learners. The course will address three major areas of educational technology:

1. Telecommunications  (e.g., e-mail, Internet, World Wide Web);
2. Visual Communications  (e.g., printed materials & presentations; visual literacy);
3. Interactive Multimedia  (e.g., educational software use and evaluation; instructional multimedia)
 

Course Objectives
1. Identify problems for which varied technologies offer useful alternatives for teachers, students, and parents/communities
2. Identify and apply related learning theories to educational computing
3. Develop projects using the following: a) word processing and/or desktop publishing software;  b) web development tools; c) desktop presentation software.
4. Review, evaluate, and use software tools and programs used in instructional settings.
5. Review current research regarding uses of technology in education.
6. Prepare an empirically-referenced critical analysis paper on an instructional technology topic.
7. Prepare and deliver an informative presentation based on your critical analysis paper.
 

  [Back to Top]
 

Text
 Roblyer, M.D. & Edwards, J. (2000) Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Articles
Becker, H.J. (1998). Running to catch a moving train: Schools and information technologies. Theory into Practice. 37 (1), 20-30.

Braden, R. (1996). Visual Literacy. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 1107 - 1135). New York: MacMillan. [online] available: http://www.aect.org/Intranet/Publications/edtech/16/index.html

Hannafin, M.J., Hannafin, K.M., Hooper, S.R., Reiber, L.P., & Kini, A.S. (1996). Research on and Research with Emerging Technologies. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 378 - 402). New York: MacMillan.

Kozma / Ritchie Series:

Kozma, R. (2000). Reflections on the state of educational technology research and development. ETRD, 48(1), 5-15.

Kozma, R. (2000). The relationship between technology and design in educational technology research and development: A reply to Richey. ETRD, 48(1), 19-21.

Richey, R. (2000). Reflections on the state of educational technology research and development: A response to Kozma. ETRD, 48(1), 16-18.

Murphy, K. (1995). The potential for mindful teachiong at a distance: A dual challenge in educating teachers. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1(2/3) 167-183.

Pea, R.D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167-182.

Salomon, G. (1998). Technology's Promises and Dangers in a Psychological and Educational Context. Theory into Practice. 37 (1), 4-10.

(Additional readings may be provided as the course progresses.)
 
 

Materials
For this course you will need:
1) Zip disks (one will be provided by the instructor)
2) an e-mail address and website (activated by the end of the first class session)
3) lots of time (many many hours each week for projects and readings)
 

  [Back to Top]
 
 
 
 
 

Projects

Attendance / Participation / In-Class Activities
Attendance is crucial, especially considering the density of facts, concepts, principles, and procedures covered each class. Missing even one class may set you seriously behind. Your participation will be assessed through your contributions to class discussions and idea sharing, both in class and via electronic means. This includes responses to the reading assignments and in-class activities. If you do not contribute fairly to any of the group projects, your individual score for that project may be lower than the group score.

Personal Website
Early in the semester you will create a personal website. As the course progresses, you will further develop your website to include article reactions, research findings, relevant links, etc. (individual project)

Article Summaries
In addition to the assigned readings, do a library (or possibly internet) search for articles on an aspect of instructional technology of interest to you. Articles from refereed journals are acceptable. One of the articles may be from a non-refereed journal, trade magazine, or internet sites only if it is of high quality and credibility, is important to the applied practice of technology or presentation development, and is at least three pages in length (show me the article in advance). Choose two articles, 1998 or newer, and for each one, submit source information (APA style), a brief summary, and a copy of the original article. In addition to the hard copy submitted in class, post the article summaries and source information on your website prior to class on the date due. (individual project)

Recommended Site Annotations
The World Wide Web includes many innovative ways in which educators from almost every field are using technology. Find at least two examples of excellent, educationally appropriate sites. For each, write a thorough annotation describing the site and suggestions for its use in educational settings. Submit your annotations via both hardcopy and posted to your website. (individual project)

Article Responses
For each of the assigned articles, submit a brief (about one page) response that includes the following elements: 1. Summary of main idea / focus, 2. Impact on practice of education, 3. your Gut Reaction to the article, and 4. Question(s) / topic(s) for discussion that emerged from the article. (individual project)

Article Summaries
In addition to the assigned readings, do a library (or possibly internet) search for articles on an aspect of instructional technology of interest to you. Articles from refereed journals are acceptable. One of the articles may be from a non-refereed journal, trade magazine, or internet sites only if it is of high quality and credibility, is important to the applied practice of technology or presentation development, and is at least three pages in length (show me the article in advance). Choose two articles, 1998 or newer, and for each one, submit source information (APA style), a brief summary, and a copy of the original article. In addition to the hard copy submitted in class, post the article summaries and source information on your website prior to class on the date due. (individual project)

WhitePaper
Create a double-sided "white paper" summarizing current research and literature findings regarding the impact of a specific high-profile emerging technology on education. Grading is dependent on the quality and thoroughness of the research findings included as well as the visual presentation of the material. You are encouraged to use the same topic for the white paper as for the critical analysis project. (individual project)

Critical Analysis Project
Prepare an empirically-referenced critical analysis paper on a topic related to emerging and instructional technologies. You are encouraged to use the same topic as for the white paper and the presentation project. The critical analysis should include the following: introduction; problem/issues addressed by the topic; critical review and analysis of related background research and theory; implications for learning; and summary of significant issues and conclusions. (group project)

C.A. Presentation Project
Using PowerPoint, develop an instructional presentation (minimum 12 slides) on a specific instructional technology topic. Give the presentation to the class and include a handout. The presentation should include at least the following components: introduction; problem / issues addressed by the topic; critical review and analysis of related background research and theory; implications for learning, and summary of significant issues and conclusions. This project will be graded on both technical execution and content. (group project)

Software Evaluation Project
Evaluate one instructor-approved educational software project. In addition to the written evaluation (at least two pages each) submitted to the instructor, post the evaluations to your website. (individual project)

Instructional Presentation (Authoring) Project
Using either HyperStudio or PowerPoint, develop a "mini" branching, instructional multimedia project that presents content from a teaching area of your choice. Your project must include all the elements of multimedia and other minimum criteria as discussed in class. (individual project)

Concept Test
You will be evaluated regarding your understanding of the instructional technology concepts explored in this course. We will discuss the format of the exam in class. (individual project)

Teamwork Points
From 0 to 10 points will be allocated to teams based on team individualsí demonstrated ability to work together for the good of the team as a whole. Examples include (but are not limitted to): Each team member website is current, complete, accurate, and well designed (accomplished by critiqing each otherís sites and suggesting improvements and making sure all your teammates know how to (and do) fix any problems; Each member contributes fairly and responsibly to group projects and maintains frequent communication and positive group interactions; Each team member upports all other team members to do their best work.
 

Any student in this course who has a disability that may prevent him or her from fully demonstrating his or her abilities should contact me personally as soon as possible, so we can discuss accommodations necessary to ensure full participation and facilitation.
 

Course Topics
The following are examples of topics that may be used for the research based projects in this course.
You are welcome to suggest additional topics for use with instructor approval.

 [Back to Top]
 
 

Grading
Your grade in this course will reflect the quality of your effort, participation, progress, and performance. Each assignment will be awarded points up to the maximum for each assignment.
 
Assignment
Points
Date Due
Article Responses
(7 @ 5pts.)   35
8-28; 9-4; 9-11; 9-18; 9-25
Website 
(5 + 25 pts.)   30
9-25 & ongoing
Recommended Site Annotations
   (2 @ 5pts.)   10
9-25
Article Summaries
10
10-2
White Paper
10
10-9
Concept Test
10
10-30
Software Evaluations
 (2 @ 10 pts.)   20
10-16; 11-6
Instr. Project Proposal   10-16
Instructional Pres. Project
20
11-13
Critical Analysis Paper
50
11-20
C.A. Presentation
20
12-4
Teamwork Points
10
Ongoing
Attendance & Participation
25
Ongoing
Total Points Possible
(No extra credit)
 
250
 
225-250  =  A 
200-224  =  B 
 175-199  =  C 
 150-174  =  D 
 0-149  =  F 
Late Work
All late assignments (with or without pre-approval) will result in a 10% penalty.
No assignment will be accepted more than one class session after the due date.

Any student in this course who has a disability that may prevent him or her from fully demonstrating his or her abilities should contact me personally as soon as possible, so we can discuss accommodations necessary to ensure full participation and facilitation.

Closing Comments and Cautions
The amount of time you will spend on this condensed course may astound you. Educational computing may represent a dramatic shift in the type of coursework taken to date. "Practice, trial, and error" time is usually underestimated. You might find it more difficult to control your study habits than in a lecture or text-based course. You may also be amazed at how quickly time passes while working at the computer terminal. Hopefully (and usually), you will also become intrigued with the computer system, and feel challenged by educational application problems. The demands on both the students and instructor in condensed courses are substantial, and will almost certainly be different from the demands of many courses that you may have taken so far. My best advice is to immerse yourself in the work as early as possible and avoid falling behind. If you heed this advice you will find course information, activities, and applications of great interest and professional relevance. This course will be very useful and satisfying if you dive in from the very start, but very problematic for those who fall behind.
 

  [Back to Top]
 
 
 
 

Activity Schedule
Assignments are due on the dates on which they are listed.
 
Wk. Date Topics & Activities Reading/Assignment Due

 
 
 

 

8-21 
 
 
 

 

Introductions, Syllabus, Readings, Concepts
Assignments, Study Tips, E-mail & Websites, 
Topics, & Research Projects 
Critical Analysis Project 
Digital Cameras 
Personal Profiles 
 
 

 


 
 
 

 

8-28 
 
 

 

Discuss Readings 
Starting Point: Problems v. Tools 
Internet Resources 
Begin Personal Websites 
Digital Pics of class (Mavica) 
Roblyer 1-2 
Hannafin, et al & Response 
E-mail & Website activated 
Groups formed 
 3 
 
 

 

 9-4 
 
 

 

Discuss Readings (group concept map) 
Visual Literacy / Layout & Legibility 
Printed Materials & Desktop Publishing 
    (Educational D'top Pub. Examples) 
White Paper Assignment 
Roblyer, Chapter 3 
Braden, 1995 
 

 

 4 
 
 
 

 

9-11 
 
 
 

 

Presentation Graphics 
    (Titles & Text; Drawings & Photos; 
    Tables, Charts, & Graphs) 
Screen Design Basics & "Design Crimes" 
Presentation Project 
Intro to PowerPoint 
Kozma / Ritchie & Response 
Pea, 1985 & Response 
 
 

 

 5 
 
 
 
 

 

  9-18 
 
 
 

 

Discuss Readings 
Telecommunications, Resources, 
WWW Demos, Search Engines, Tools, 
"Recommended website" Annotations 
File Transfer Protocal (ftp) 
Posting Article Responses 
(Post all Responses, email links to Instructor) 
Research Topic Proposal 
Websites Ready to Post 
Roblyer, Chapters 7 - 9 
Murphy, 1995 & Response 

 


 
 

 

9-25 
 
 

 

Multimedia Basics 
MM & Learning Theories 
Educational Software Programs 
Software Evaluation Criteria 
Software Evaluation Project 
Roblyer Chapters 4 - 6 
Becker, 1998 & Response 
Website accessible 
Recommended Website 

 

10-2 

 

Discuss Readings 
Social Impacts of Technology 
Critical Analysis Topics Discussion 
Article Summaries 
Salomon, 1998 & Response 

 

10-9 

 

Discuss Articles 
Instructional Presentation Project 
Demo & Project Assignment 
White Paper 
Pick 2 of Roblyer 10 - 15 
10-16  Individual Work on Instr. Projects 
H.S. problems / questions 
Software Eval. 1 (also online) 
Instr. Pres. Project Proposal 
   (submit hardcopy & post online)
10  10-23  Work on Projects 
Group mtgs. with instructor 
Critical Analysis Outline 
11  10-30  Concept Test 
Work on Projects 
Websites Updated 
12  11-6  Software Evaluation Presentations  Software Eval. 2 (also online) 
13  11-13  Instr. Project Presentations  All Instr. Pres. Projects 
Peer Feedback on Websites 
14  11-20  Handouts (& Miscellaneous Topics) 
Group meetings / Work on projects 
Critical Analysis Paper 
15  11-27  Screen Design Feedback Session 
Group meetings / Work on presentations 
Preliminary Screens 
16  12-4  Presentations  Presentation Project 
* This syllabus is subject to change.