As part of promoting a culture of learning and student success at OU, the Office of Academic Assessment had established a biennial university-wide conference commonly referred to as the “OU Assessment Forum.” The event, which was held four times, drew faculty and staff from departments and academic affairs offices across the OU campus to engage in open and rich conversations about issues, strategies, and processes associated with assessment as a tool to improve student learning and institutional effectiveness in promoting student success through interactive presentations, roundtables, and plenary addresses. Attendees shared best practices in the assessment of student learning at the course, program, and institutional levels.
To access information regarding past OU Assessment Forums, click the links below:
The University of Oklahoma Office of Academic Assessment’s inaugural Assessment Forum took place over four full morning sessions from November 10 to November 13, 2014. The Forum was intended to provide an opportunity for dialogue between the newly-created Office of Academic Assessment and Assessment Liaisons representing various Academic Degree programs at Norman and Tulsa Campuses. Various. Each session covered the following topics:
A total of 92 Assessment Liaisons, representing from 53 different campus academic units participated in the Forum.
Participants’ responses regarding the Forum were positive, with most participants indicating appreciation for the opportunity to learn more about the reexamined focus and process of program level student learning assessment, get practical examples of student learning outcomes, and share experiences across disciplines.
The 2015 OU Assessment Forum was held on Thursday, September 24, 2015 at the OCCE Thurman J. White Forum Building.
The theme for the Forum was “Cultivating a Culture of Assessment: From Classroom to Program to Institution”. This theme was meant to reinforce the 2014 Inaugural Assessment Forum which set the foundation for critical dialogue regarding fostering a culture of assessment of student learning and continuous improvement at the University of Oklahoma.
The event featured Opening Address by Dr. Simin Pulat, Vice-Provost for Faculty Development, Keynote by Dr. Gloria Rogers, Senior Scholar at the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) and a nationally renowned assessment expert, breakout sessions presented by OU faculty from various disciplines and an interactive Panel Session of OU faculty. Dr. Felix Wao, Director of Academic Assessment, presented Closing Remarks.
The 2016 OU Assessment Forum was held on Friday, September 16 following a the overwhelmingly positive feedback we received from the 2015 Assessment Forum.
This year’s Assessment Forum centered on Enhancing Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Assessment: Using Research-Based Strategies. The conference featured Opening remarks by OU Provost and Senior Vice President, Dr. Kyle Harper, Keynote speech and a follow up highly interactive session by Dr. Tom Angelo, an internationally renowned researcher, faculty developer and assessment expert. The event was designed to enable attendees to champion innovative processes in course and program assessment, network with colleagues, and engage with OU faculty in the following informative and interactive sessions:
2016 KEYNOTE PRESENTATION (PDF)
PRESENTATION MATERIALS
The theme of the 2018 OU Assessment Forum was Enhancing Program Excellence Through Assessment. The conference featured Opening Remarks by OU Provost and Senior Vice President, Dr. Kyle Harper, Keynote speech and a follow up interactive session by Dr. Peggy Maki, a nationally renowned Education Consultant specializing in assessing student learning in higher education. The OU faculty members and staff participated in the sessions including presentations and interactive roundtable discussions emphasizing various practical aspects of assessment including but not limited to the following:
DEAN'S DIALOGUE: LISTENING TO STUDENTS AND USING OUTCOME OF THE PROCESS TO IMPROVE PROGRAMS (PDF)
by Ed Kelly and David Craig
As part of annual assessment, Gaylord College uses Dialogue with the Deans sessions in which the three college deans visit and listen to students each semester in the capstone courses for the college's five undergraduate majors. In this session, the dean and associate dean will talk about the value of these discussions and how they have led to improvements in the college.
TEACHING AND ASSESSING SERVICE LEARNING (PDF)
by Melanie Wilderman and Michael Crespin
Melanie Wilderman
Topic: Assessing Service Learning and Community Learning in Journalism & Communication Course
Quality teaching of service learning also requires quality assessment of the learning activities and outcomes so we can continuously improve our teaching strategies and make sure we are serving our students and our communities. Based on 10 semesters of the presenter teaching and assessing service learning in a news reporting class, participants can expect to take away 1) concrete ideas for conducting meaningful assessment as well as 2) ideas to improve the structure of service learning activities based on assessment outcomes.
Michael Crespin
Topic: Teaching and Assessing Civic and Community Internships
The Carl Albert Center places Capitol and Community Scholars in institutions and organizations that run the policy-making process for the State of Oklahoma and here in Norman. In this presentation, I will talk about evaluating their internship experiences and how students have the opportunity to reflect on what they are learning throughout the semester.
STRATEGIES FOR ASSESSING WRITING ENRICHED CURRICULUM IN NATURAL SCIENCES
by Tami Martyn and Robert Scafe
Though many teachers imagine assessment as an end-of-instruction ritual, in fact the practice of “backward design” makes “thinking like an assessor” the first stage of curriculum development. In this session, a chemist and a writing specialist discuss how they used tools from the assessor’s kit—namely, identifying deep learning outcomes and their attendant “skills” and “knowledge”—to find a common language as they revised and assessed a lab report curriculum for General Chemistry. Participants will learn to use assessment not only to improve communication with students in teaching materials, but also to better coordinate faculty and support staff efforts in curricular design.
DESIGNING EFFECTIVE ASSESSMENTS ONLINE LEARNING
by Robert Edmonson
Undergraduate capstone courses assessing knowledge and skills through formal research assignments may not be well suited to online programs designed for working adults seeking knowledge applicability such as the College of Professional and Continuing Studies. We are adopting an approach based on experiential transformative learning with alternative deliverables and service-learning. However, perspectives transformation among adult online service-learners is an elusive outcome to assess and community-defined deliverables are less suited to analytic rubrics compared to research papers. It is hoped that the 2018 Forum will provide further insight into these outcomes assessment challenges.
ASSESSING ARTISTIC GROWTH IN CREATIVE DISCIPLINES
by Harold R. Mortimer
The history of assessments within various creative disciplines (art, dance, drama, music, musical theatre, etc., etc.) traditionally occurred via written comments and verbal response. Ask many teachers of these disciplines to assign a numeric assessment OR create an exact rubric that all must adhere to and one of two things happen: 1) A glaze of fog of confusion envelopes their brains; or 2) Faculty become irate that both they and their students within the arts must be pigeonholed into rigid criteria. This presentation serves to alleviate fears and educate arts faculty to the benefits (and ease) of consistent assessment.
CONTEXTUAL ASSESSMENET OF STUDENT LEARNING THROUGH REFLECTION ON DOING (PDF)
by Farrokh Mistree and Janet Allen
Observations: “We are currently preparing students for jobs that don’t yet exist using technologies that haven’t been invented in order to solve problems we don’t even know are problems yet.” (Former Secretary of Education Richard Riley).
“Rather than focusing on specific technologies or specific problems, we need to equip students with those concepts that are common to all problems, all technologies, all skills, ranging from workplace engineering to ethics to entrepreneurship.” (The Jobs Revolution: Changing How America Works by Steve Gunderson, Roberts Jones, and Kathryn Scanland, 2004).
The Challenge: How can we, in our courses, empower our students with the competency to learn throughout their careers by reflecting on doing?
Invitation: If the answer to the preceding question is of interest to you let us start to dialog.
THE MANTRA OF GRADUATE EDUCATION REFORM: WHY THE PRAYERS AREN’T ANSWERED (PDF)
by Michael Ashby
The regular drumbeat of similar recommendations to advance graduate education by a constant stream of national studies over the past two decades has failed to prompt action. An important reason why the studies have not gained traction is the fact the target recipients of the studies—and especially graduate students—have not been asked whether they agree with the studies’ recommendations. To develop a consensus path forward to reform graduate education, there is need for further conversations that include the entire community of stakeholders, and especially with our junior collogues, the graduate students. This session will focus on 1) Assessing the pains and needs of graduate students and 2) Assessing whether our graduate programs meet those needs.
ASSESSING TRANSFORMATIVE LEARNING (PDF)
by Jenel Cavazos and Ben Heddy
Transforming students is a laudable, yet lofty goal for teachers. Of course, our goal is to have a lasting impact on students, but can we really transform them? This presentation will describe a construct called transformative experience (TE). TE occurs when students apply classroom content to their everyday lives in a way that facilitates an expanded perception and value for the content. We will focus on learning the concept, discussing pedagogical methods for its facilitation, and describing how to measure student transformation.
EFFECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF INDEPENDENT RESEARCH SKILLS: CASE STUDY OF CAPSTONE EXPERIENCE IN METEOROLOGY
by Michael Richman
For undergraduate students, selecting a scientific research project, understanding the professional literature, analyzing data and communicating the details and importance of a project in the timeframe of a semester or two is a challenging task. Our Senior Capstone class attempts to integrate the research experience in a rubric with multiple checkpoints, in which each student obtains feedback that help guide them to a successful outcome.
A statistical analysis measuring each student’s growth and the effects of assessment in changing aspects of the class will be presented. The significance the students’ growth will be discussed, as well as a two-year longitudinal analysis of the data.
The presentation will be an open discussion of (1) creating useful assessment checkpoints, (2) some ideas of providing helpful feedback to students and (3) how the assessor can statistically analyze the data arising from the checkpoints (and for multiple years) to gain useful insight and to improve the class.
IDENTIFYING AND USING ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN CANVAS (PDF)
by Kevin Buck and Ben Lewis
How do you track mastery in a course? This session will explore two tools in Canvas – Rubrics and Outcomes. Learn how enabling this will allow you to measure pedagogical goals and communicate criteria for assignments. Participants will leave with the following skill – how to apply rubrics and outcomes to track learning mastery.
USING OF RUBRICS TO EFFECTIVELY ASSESS STUDENT LEARNING (PDF)
by Melody Huckaby Rawlett
This presentation will walk faculty through the steps of rubric formulation, use, and feedback. It will focus on use of rubrics in the classroom and as a larger assessment tool to address overall learning within the department. In both the classroom and in assessment, rubrics allow faculty to find and close gaps in learning. Systematic use of rubrics creates opportunities to adopt changes to benefit student learning.
THE POTENTIAL FOR MULTI-DIMENSIONAL OUTCOMES BY INTEGRATING VIRTUES INTO SUBSTANTIVE COURSE CONTENT
by David Craig and Aimee Franklin
David Craig:
This session will focus on the presenter's experience revising a Gaylord College undergraduate course, Journalism Ethics, to focus more on virtues with the support of the OU Institute for the Study of Human Flourishing. The instructor assessed several assignments used in the class revision including an exemplar paper, short reflections and exams. The results offer insights on teaching and assessment in courses where virtues are a component.
Aimee Franklin:
This session describes how course assignments culminated in undergraduate students' creating reflective portfolios and making peer to peer presentations illustrating how human flourishing values enriched their understanding and analysis of substantive course content. Participants will be invited to identify a value that would be salient for their substantive content, then brainstorm how to pair the value with an existing assignment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STRATEGIES FOR EFFECTIVE DOCUMENTATION OF ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES TO MEET ACCREDITATION STANDARDS
by John Jones
The scope of program accreditation is to capture the essence of student learning relative to university programs that demonstrate alignment to national standards and to determine if program completers can demonstrate those standards through content knowledge and skill activities. This quality assurance is accomplished through external peer review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INCORPORATING AND ASSESSING SERVICE-LEARNING IN AN UNDERGRADUATE OR GRADUATE COURSE: SIMPLE AND PRACTICAL TECHNIQUES
by Joy Pendley
OU Community Engagement is working with faculty advisory committees to develop resources for teaching, research and outreach. The Service Learning Committee (made up of faculty, The Writing Center, CTE and Office of Assessment) established criteria for designating service-learning courses. This designation will be visible in the enrollment process and on the student transcripts, making it easier for students to locate service-learning opportunities and for the university to track student and faculty participation. In this roundtable, we will talk briefly about the criteria that include both assessment of student learning outcomes and community partnerships and see examples of faculty syllabi and learning assessments and learn about roundtable participants’ experience with assessing service-learning and community engagement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSESSING STUDENT WRITING IN THE SCIENCES
by Karen Antell and Megan Elwood Madden
At this roundtable discussion, we will present writing assessment techniques used in their GeoWriting class, including guided peer review, extended rubrics, and instructor review & rewriting.
In addition, they will discuss ways to integrate these techniques into Canvas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF INTERNSHIP EXPERIENCES ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
by Natalie O’Reilly and Shane R. Brady
Professional programs often vary from traditional academic programs and disciplines in their emphasis on applied learning that prepares students for entering a specific workforce. In social work, the primary assessment point within the curriculum to determine if students have attained the needed knowledge and skills from the curriculum in order to successfully engage in professional practice is field practicum. This session will focus on explaining the role of internships in the development of competency among social work students and how the school collects assessment data to demonstrate competency attainment of social work students and for program improvement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EFFECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF TEAMWORK SKILLS
by Somik Ghosh
Upon graduation, students from the Construction Science program engage in diverse teams including key members of a project. To prepare the students for their profession, assignments are geared to engage students in collaborative problem-solving and decision-making processes. Students are expected to effectively plan, organize, schedule, execute, and lead construction management-related projects in a project team environment to assess team, team members, and project performance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INSIGHTS FOR EFFECTIVELY ASSESSING COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF GRADUATE STUDENTS
by Deepak Devegowda
Petroleum Engineering students face a unique problem. The oil and gas industry is characterized by a bimodal population distribution, with a large percentage of people in the 55+ age group and a large proportion in the 25 to 35 age group as well. Because of the way the industry evolved over the years, the former group has great experience but little to no formal education beyond a bachelor’s degree and sometimes, even lesser. The latter group is characterized with little to no experience but come armed with MS and doctorates in Petroleum Engineering. Getting students to navigate the technical gap but also the generational gap is a challenge that has slowly lead to the 10-minute short talk or even a 2- or 3-minute elevator speech. These are really short talks where students distill years of research in to succinct, non-technical speeches that can be understood by the lay person. In this talk, I discuss some of the success stories, what worked and what did not and present a plan for the future to help our students advance their communication skills.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSESSING DIVERSITY AND INCLUSIVITY: EFFECTIVE AND PRACTICAL TECHNIQUES
by Anthony Natale
This roundtable will focus on practical techniques for assessing diversity and inclusion within group projects. Session materials include a sample group contract, a reflective written assignment of individual contributions to group work, and an oral reflection method focused on observations, reflections, interpretations, and decisions. Each is overviewed with tips and discussion on their application in the classroom.
Learning Objectives:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT PROCESS: THE PRICE EXAMPLE
by Frances L. Ayres and Beth Stetson
Participants will practice drafting Program Objectives, Learning Goals and Measurable Outcomes for their program and participate in interactive discussion. We will discuss the integrated assessment process for Price College of Business (PCOB)’s Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) program. PCOB is accredited by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). AACSB directs schools to define their own mission and operate to fulfill that mission. PCOB’s BBA program’s mission, curriculum and related assessment is derived from PCOB’s mission. Assessment data is gathered via the capstone course, nationally-normed objective tests and career placement data. We will discuss the design and operation of the BBA program’s assessment plan, including the use of assessment results to “close the loop” and implement meaningful program change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACADEMIC LIFE ADVISING: AN INNOVATIVE ADVISING APPROACH TO PROMOTE STUDENT SUCCESS
by Kathleen Smith
Mentoring has remained a critical element within the culture of higher education and has proven to be one of the most effective strategies for integrating students into the institutional fabric and their academic discipline, key predictors of degree completion. Given the power of mentorship, there are few practical frameworks to guide meaningful conversation that inspires action. Students’ lives are rarely compartmentalized where academics are experienced separately from other dimensions of their human identity and they rely on faculty for support and guidance. Please join this roundtable discussion where we will discuss our own experiences with mentorship and share how we can take our own lessons learned to strengthen mentoring practices at OU. Participants will be introduced to Academic Life Coaching, an innovative advising approach designed to invite engagement, empower executive functioning capabilities, and bring greater purpose to the mentorship relationship.
Building on the University of Oklahoma’s existing cyclical commitment to report on and use assessment results to improve students’ learning, this keynote initially makes the case for why closely gauging students’ progress toward achieving high-quality exit-level outcomes and developing on-time interventions to improve patterns of underperformance along currently enrolled students’ educational pathways needs to become the new assessment norm. This approach represents a commitment to students’ equitable progress toward achieving high-quality outcomes. A confluence of developments across the landscape of higher education in this century, including the expanding use of scoring rubrics and technological means to aggregate and disaggregate scoring results, now makes it possible to use assessment results nimbly in real time in a shared commitment to currently enrolled students’ success.
FOLLOW-UP INTERACTIVE SESSION (PDF)
by Peggy Maki
The follow up interactive session identifies the shared set of learner-centered commitments, principles, and processes that underlie the Real-time Student Assessment approach to assessment, including:
a) Informed about patterns of performance and underperformance across your student demographics and
b) Aware of the need for timely institutional support, interventions, or resources to improve patterns of underperformance as they emerge or persist in currently enrolled students’ work.
Dr. Felix Wao opens the 2018 OU Assessment Forum
Dr. Kyle Harper gives the welcoming speach
Dr. Peggy Maki delivers the keynote address and follow-up discussion
Attendees of the 2018 OU Assessment Forum
Roundtable
Roundtable
Roundtable
Roundtable
Roundtable
Roundtable
Roundtable
Roundtable
Concurrent Session