The Isis Current Bibliography surveys recent publications in the history of science. It covers all disciplines and time periods. The bibliography was begun in 1913 by the historian of science George Sarton as part of his new journal, Isis, and it has been published continuously since then. In 2000 the bibliography office moved to the University of Oklahoma.
The print version of the bibliography appears annually and is mailed with the December issue of the journal Isis. Access to the bibliographic data is also available online through OCLC’s HistSciTechMed database, which can be consulted through many libraries in North America and some institutions outside of North America. All members of the History of Science Society have access to this database as part of their membership.
IsisCB Explore is an open-access search interface for the History of Science Society's ISIS Current Bibliography. It includes over 270,000 interlinked bibliographic citations to books, chapters, articles, dissertations, and reviews from 1974 to present. This site is supported by the OU Department of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine, the OU History of Science Collections, and the History of Science Society. IsisCB Explore was created by Prof. Stephen Weldon, the History of Science Society's bibliographer, and made possible by support from an Alfred P. Sloan Foundation grant in 2014. The IsisCB is also an active research project focusing on data related to the discipline of history of science. Weldon is collaborating with several other scholars and graduate students on digital humanities and data/computational history of science. You can see a list of the projects that have grown out of the Isis Current Bibliography on the IsisCB blog site.
The Center for the Study of Emerging Technologies (CSET) facilitates research and collaboration among faculty and students at the University of Oklahoma, in partnership with public, private and voluntary sector stakeholders.
CSET advances the study of emerging technologies with an emphasis on understanding them in their full human context: historical, cultural, social, economic, political. For us, the ‘emerging’ phase for a given technology does not stop at commercialization and extends through the maturation of the technology in the built environment, meaning that we are interested in the adaptation of infrastructures and multi-generational systems to new technologies and new social and physical environments as well as in the emergence of technologies at the leading edge of innovation, such as AI, biotech, or quantum technologies.
Through a generous endowment provided by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation to the Department of History of Science, Technology, and Medicine, and the History of Science Collections, the University of Oklahoma offers a travel fellowship program for visitors to make use of its resources for research in the History of Science. The Andrew W. Mellon Travel Fellowship Program is intended to assist scholars at both pre-doctoral and post-doctoral levels.
The program is designed to provide travel expenses and a reasonable per diem to researchers who reside outside the central Oklahoma area, and who have well-defined research projects that can be served by the holdings of the History of Science Collections. Support is available for qualifying projects for periods ranging from one to six weeks. Although there is no limitation on the subject field of investigation, applicants must demonstrate the utility of materials in the History of Science Collections.
Applicants are encouraged to consider the fellowship program as a means of supplementing the partial funding which they may be able to obtain from their own institutions or other sources so that program funds may be extended to as many interested scholars as possible.
Fellowship projects may be scheduled for any time of the year when the Collections are open. This typically precludes fellowships at the close of the calendar year, roughly December 20 through January 5.
Applicants preparing proposals are encouraged to contact the History of Science Collections Research Coordinator at HSTM.Mellon@ou.edu.
We have three annual deadlines; note that fellowships begin, at the earliest, three months after the award announcement.
| Fall Deadline | Winter Deadline | Spring Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| September 15 | February 15 | April 15 |
| Fellowship begins no earlier than January 5 | Fellowship begins no earlier than June 1 | Fellowship begins no earlier than September 1 |
The amount of Fellowship support is based on length of time in residence, ranging from one to six weeks. Refer to the table below for the fellowship total award amounts. Delivery of the award will be based on the actual length of residence. Payment of the award will be provided after the fellowship is completed.
| Fellowship Length | Domestic Total Award | International Total Award |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week | $600 | $1,600 |
| 2 weeks | $1,200 | $2,200 |
| 3 weeks | $1,800 | $2,800 |
| 4 weeks | $2,400 | $3,400 |
| 5 weeks | $3,000 | $4,000 |
| 6 weeks | $3,600 | $4,600 |
Proposals should include four sections:
Submit your proposal by email as a single, combined PDF, to History of Science Collections Research Coordinator at HSTM.Mellon@ou.edu.
In general, fellowship applications are evaluated under the following three criteria:
The selection process is competitive, and all three criteria are considered very carefully. Because the Travel Fellowship Program is specifically designed to encourage use of Collections materials, the third criterion is especially important.
Fellowship recipients are responsible for booking lodging and other travel. Visit OU's Housing and Food website for information regarding on-campus accommodations.
If you plan to stay off campus and you do not have a vehicle, we recommend that you find a place within 1.5-2.0 miles of Bizzell Library.
We advise applicants from abroad to review the University of Oklahoma’s procedures and policies relating to international travel during the application process. General information may be found on the OU main J-1 page.
ALL applicants should become familiar with federal, state, and local tax regulations and rules, as well as, wire transfer fees for payment.
State and federal taxes on the funds provided by the Mellon fellowship can be extremely high-as much as 40% of the award amount in some cases.
Also be aware that banking wire transfer fees will be deducted from the amount, and we have no control over how those funds are routed and what the fees are.
Frequently asked questions about the Andrew W. Mellon Travel Fellowship Program
Short-Term Travel Fellowships are available to scholars at both the pre-doctoral and post-doctoral levels. Scholars whose principal residence or place of employment is inside the central Oklahoma area may not apply for short-term travel fellowships.
Applications from former fellows are welcome after an interval of six months, provided they have submitted a final report for previous award periods. All applicants are encouraged to seek multiple sources of support, and this is particularly true for repeat fellows, since award amounts may be adjusted considering receipt of previous funds.
The central Oklahoma area, as determined by the Mellon Travel Fellowship Committee, is defined as the area within 100 miles of Norman, Oklahoma. Any scholar whose principal residence or place of employment is located within this region is ineligible for a short-term travel fellowship.
The selection committee for the Mellon Travel Fellowship Program consists of the Curator and Research Coordinator of the History of Science Collections and the Chair of the History of Science Department. The committee will solicit the expert opinions of other faculty when appropriate.
Please browse the websites for the History of Science Collections and the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Department. Applicants are encouraged to discuss their projects with the Research Coordinator at HSTM.Mellon@ou.edu.
Fellowship recipients are responsible for booking lodging and other travel. Information regarding on-campus accommodations.
If you plan to stay off campus and you do not have a vehicle, we recommend that you find a place within 1.5-2.0 miles of Bizzell Library.
Princeton University Press, 2026
Few people today have heard of Johannes de Sacrobosco, yet his textbook was the most widely read astronomy book ever written. For five hundred years, from when it was first written in the Middle Ages to the dawn of the modern world, the Sphere introduced Europeans to the cosmos. The Book Everyone Read traces the unpredictable twists and turns of scientific knowledge and discovery through the stories of Sacrobosco’s readers—and in doing so, tells a new story of the emergence of modern science.
Kathleen Crowther shows how the secret to the Sphere’s longevity lay with its readers themselves, who chose which aspects of Sacrobosco’s original thirteenth-century text to accept, which to modify, and which to reject. Far from unchanging, editions of the book were accompanied by commentary, corrections, and details that challenged and revised the book’s original worldview of a finite, Earth-centered cosmos. Crowther introduces us to the university professors who peppered their lectures on the Sphere with tales of the exciting new discoveries made with telescopes and musings on the new Sun-centered model proposed by Copernicus, the navigators who found their way across the Atlantic using information about the stars they found in the book, the missionaries who brought translations of it to the Americas and Asia, and many others.
Through the surprising life of a medieval book of astronomy, The Book Everyone Read charts a scientific conversation that extended far beyond what we understood before.
University of Chicago Press, 2014
Historians of science have long noted the influence of the nineteenth-century political economist Thomas Robert Malthus on Charles Darwin. In a bold move, Piers J. Hale contends that this focus on Malthus and his effect on Darwin’s evolutionary thought neglects a strong anti-Malthusian tradition in English intellectual life, one that not only predated the 1859 publication of the Origin of Species but also persisted throughout the Victorian period until World War I. Political Descent reveals that two evolutionary and political traditions developed in England in the wake of the 1832 Reform Act: one Malthusian, the other decidedly anti-Malthusian and owing much to the ideas of the French naturalist Jean Baptiste Lamarck. These two traditions, Hale shows, developed in a context of mutual hostility, debate, and refutation. Participants disagreed not only about evolutionary processes but also on broader questions regarding the kind of creature our evolution had made us and in what kind of society we ought therefore to live. Significantly, and in spite of Darwin’s acknowledgement that natural selection was “the doctrine of Malthus, applied to the whole animal and vegetable kingdoms,” both sides of the debate claimed to be the more correctly “Darwinian.” By exploring the full spectrum of scientific and political issues at stake, Political Descent offers a novel approach to the relationship between evolution and political thought in the Victorian and Edwardian eras.
Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015
Before the Second World War, social scientists struggled to define and defend their disciplines. After the war, "high modern" social scientists harnessed new resources in a quest to create a unified understanding of human behavior—and to remake the world in the image of their new model man.
In Age of System, Hunter Heyck explains why social scientists—shaped by encounters with the ongoing "organizational revolution" and its revolutionary technologies of communication and control—embraced a new and extremely influential perspective on science and nature, one that conceived of all things in terms of system, structure, function, organization, and process. He also explores how this emerging unified theory of human behavior implied a troubling similarity between humans and machines, with freighted implications for individual liberty and self-direction.
These social scientists trained a generation of decision-makers in schools of business and public administration, wrote the basic textbooks from which millions learned how the economy, society, polity, culture, and even the mind worked, and drafted the position papers, books, and articles that helped set the terms of public discourse in a new era of mass media, think tanks, and issue networks. Drawing on close readings of key texts and a broad survey of more than 1,800 journal articles, Heyck follows the dollars—and the dreams—of a generation of scholars that believed in "the system." He maps the broad landscape of changes in the social sciences, focusing especially intently on the ideas and practices associated with modernization theory, rational choice theory, and modeling.
Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023
In Technology in Southeast Asian History, Suzanne Moon explores the profound entanglement of technology with Southeast Asian politics, social life, economics, and culture over its long history. Moon offers a unique framework for understanding the place of technology in this region and its pivotal role in the emergence of the modern technological world. Synthesizing scholarship from the fields of history, archaeology, and anthropology, Moon examines and links technological stories from pre-history to the mid-twentieth century. She uses analytics in the history of technology - such as circulation, coproduction, and assemblage - to highlight the processes and evolving patterns of technological dynamism that characterize the region. Drawing on research focused on specific technologies, including temple construction, rice agriculture, weaving, and shipbuilding, Moon investigates the interconnectedness of these technologies within the larger political and economic fabric of Southeast Asian history. In contrast with portrayals of Southeast Asia as technologically deficient, Moon demonstrates the richness of this region's technological cultures and underscores Southeast Asia's role as a dynamic cocreator of the modern technological world.
University of Pittsburgh Press, 2026
Modern Paris is often hailed as a capital of urban infrastructure. Baron Georges-Eugène Haussmann’s rebuilding of Paris in 1853–1870, branded “Haussmannization,” helped define urban modernity for cities worldwide. But even as infrastructures expanded and modernized, some Parisians were left behind: as late as 1928, 18 percent of houses still lacked direct sewerage. Haussmannization often hid infrastructures behind walls and floors, under streets, or in peripheral districts. In the forty years after 1870, a period that Peter Soppelsa calls “secondary Haussmannization,” Parisians inverted them—revealed their hidden components to scrutinize their workings and costs for society, environment, and health—and in turn politicized them. Drawing on French government archives, engineers’ maps, the illustrated press, and a collection of over 100 photographic postcards, Soppelsa charts the diverse embodied, emotional, and everyday experiences of living with expanding urban infrastructures—streets, housing, tramways, subways, the water supply, sewers, and rivers—in Paris from 1870 to 1914. Parisians learned that infrastructures were not simply technical solutions for the social and environmental problems of city life but could also bring about new dangers and dependencies.
Routledge, 2021
Earthquakes have always been a deeply concerning phenomenon and therefore been the subject of much theorizing, both by scholars and laypeople. Although the cause of earthquakes remained a mystery until fairly recently, these earlier debates are a mirror of the changing scientific and religious views of the times, and especially of the volatile relation between the two. This is the first comprehensive study of the varying ideas on earthquakes in early modern Europe, covering the period from the late Middle Ages up to (but not including) the great earthquake of Lisbon of 1755.
Winner of the Morris D. Forkosch Award
for Best Book by the Center for Inquiry
Johns Hopkins University Press, 2020
Recent polls show that a quarter of Americans claim to have no religious affiliation, identifying instead as atheists, agnostics, or "nothing in particular." A century ago, a small group of American intellectuals who dubbed themselves humanists tread this same path, turning to science as a major source of spiritual sustenance. In The Scientific Spirit of American Humanism, Stephen P. Weldon tells the fascinating story of this group as it developed over the twentieth century, following the fortunes of a few generations of radical ministers, academic philosophers, and prominent scientists who sought to replace traditional religion with a modern, liberal, scientific outlook.
Weldon explores humanism through the networks of friendships and institutional relationships that underlay it, from philosophers preaching in synagogues and ministers editing articles of Nobel laureates to magicians invoking the scientific method. Examining the development of an increasingly antagonistic engagement between religious conservatives and the secular culture of the academy, Weldon explains how this conflict has shaped the discussion of science and religion in American culture. He also uncovers a less known—but equally influential—story about the conflict within humanism itself between two very different visions of science: an aspirational, democratic outlook held by the followers of John Dewey on the one hand, and a skeptical, combative view influenced by logical positivism on the other.
Putting America's distinctive science talk into historical perspective, Weldon shows how events such as the Pugwash movement for nuclear disarmament, the ongoing evolution controversies, the debunking of pseudo-science, and the selection of scientists and popularizers like Carl Sagan and Isaac Asimov as humanist figureheads all fit a distinctly American ethos. Weldon maintains that this secular ethos gained much of its influence by tapping into the idealism found in the American radical religious tradition that includes the deism of Thomas Paine, nineteenth-century rationalism and free thought, Protestant modernism, and most important, Unitarianism. Drawing on archival research, interviews, and a thorough study of the main humanist publications, The Scientific Spirit of American Humanism reveals a new level of detail about the personal and institutional forces that have shaped major trends in American secular culture. Significantly, the book shows why special attention to American liberal religiosity remains critical to a clear understanding of the scientific spirit in American culture.