Skip Navigation

Provost's Developmental Editing Grant

OU Arts and Humanities Forum, The University of Oklahoma logo
Skip Side Navigation

Provost's Developmental Editing Grant

Applications Open Feb. 2026. Upcoming Anticipated Deadline April 13, 2026.

The purpose of this award is to provide support to regular OU faculty in the arts, humanities, and interpretive social sciences in the completion of the final work necessary for rank advancement. Preference will be given to the completion of a single major work that disproportionately weighs in a promotion case.

Each awarded grant will provide $4500 (around 30 hours) of Developmental Editorial Support to a faculty member for writing development, especially of a single major project such as a book manuscript.

Developmental editing is one-on-one writing support for big-picture concept and flow development, rather than mechanics. Developmental editors may coach writers on everything from outline and structure planning to chapter-by-chapter feedback. The Forum will work with Awardees to choose an appropriate developmental editor for their project.

Grantees are expected to be actively circulating drafts to the developmental editor during the fellowship perioed. This support can take place over one semester, two semesters, or the summer months, but all funds must be expended within the upcoming fiscal year (July 2025-June 2026). This grant includes no salary supplement and no release from teaching duties.

Awardees should be able to demostrate significant concrete progress on their research portfolio by the end of the granting period.  

In AY2025-26, Developmental Editing grants will be awarded to two (2) OU Regular Faculty.

Preference for this grant will be given to faculty who have been at the rank of associate professor for at least five years. All associate professors who earned the rank of Associate Professor before summer 2020 are encouraged to apply.

Evaluation of the the application will heavily weight proposals from faculty whose research/scholarly/creative activities have been significantly impacted by sustained service, teaching or other extenuating life circumstances.

Proposals must be single spaced and use a font of 11 points or larger. Page margins should be 1” on all four sides.  

Please be certain that you have included all required components, in order. Late or incomplete applications will not be reviewed.    

  1. Project Description (3-5 pages)
  2. Submit a detailed overview of your scholarly/creative project that includes a project description, explanation of the contribution of the project to your field, description of audience and impact, publication/performance details, and a highly detailed outline of the compoenent parts of the major work. 

    Keep in mind that your proposal will be read by a diverse group of faculty, some of whom may have limited knowledge about your proposed project. Therefore, the project narrative should keep jargon to a minimum.

  3. Project Status and Timeline (1 page)
  4. In up to one page, describe the current status of your book or major project. Briefly explain to the committee which aspects of project research and writing are complete, and which have yet to be completed. Provide a project timeline that explains how (with developmental editing support) the project could make substantial progress to completion by the end of the granting period. 

    If the project described is a book project, provide research, drafting, editing, and completion goals for each of the remaining chapters. For other kinds of research and creative activity, provide a development-completion timeline for each of the remaining component parts of the major work.

  5. Description of Impacts to Research Pace (1 page)
  6. Within the limits of one single-spaced page, describe the ways in which extraordinary service, teaching, or extenuating life circumstances have impacted the pace of your research/scholarly/creative activity. The committee will be particularly interested in proposals the demonstrate a record of significant contribution to the University through service to students, colleagues, and the administrative tasks upon which the University depends to run.  

  7. Applicant Full CV

Proposal Submission: Save all component parts of the application as a single PDF (saved as [lastname]_PDEGrant). All applications for the Provost's Developmental Editing Grant must be submitted via email as a single PDF attachment sent to Humanities.Forum@ou.edu by the fellowship deadline. You will receive an email confirming receipt of your application.

At the conclusion of the grant period, the awardee is expected to submit a 1-2 page report to the grant program director, with copies to the academic director/chair and dean by September 30 of the year following the award. This report should describe the work completed during the fellowship period, especially as it relates to the completion and submission of the manuscript or major project.

All written publications (whether in hard copy or electronic form) should acknowledge the support of the Office of the Provost and the OU Arts and Humanities Forum.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

Please contact Kimberly Marshall, Faculty Director (Associate Professor, Department of Anthropology): kjm@ou.edu

Past Awardees

David Anderson

Dr. David Anderson

Dr. Anderson specializes in the Tudor-Stuart period in English literature. His current project, Shakespeare at the Still Point, argues for the ethical and metaphysical centrality of agape (altruistic Christian love) to Shakespeare’s imaginative bedrock. Through detailed readings of a dozen plays, the book contends that understanding Shakespeare means taking seriously, as he and so many of his fellow early modern writers did, the Biblical conception of love as a totalizing moral imperative that harmonizes human action with transcendent reality.  The playwright that emerges from this study is neither serenely pious nor a Christian triumphalist. Rather, the book explores the "deep theology" of his plays in order to trace the phenomenology of a worldview as it is experienced and wrestled with.  



Nian Liu


Between Words and Worlds: Gender, Language, and Cognition in Chinese explores how the Chinese language encodes and reinforces gendered ideologies through grammar, metaphor, and cultural cognition. This book aims at investigating how sexism is embedded and perpetuated in the Chinese language, aiming to reveal how linguistic structures—from writing systems and vocabulary to metaphors and grammar—not only reflect but also reproduce gender inequality. While earlier studies have highlighted sexist terms or idioms in Chinese, this monograph will offer the first comprehensive, multi-level study of how the architecture of the language—especially its logographic character system and syntactic norms—systematically encodes hierarchical gender ideology.

Joanna Hearne


This book traces the rise of Indigenous short-form educational media and the public mediation of Indigenous childhood across the long 1970s. It is by design a book about small media, setting out to re-value the fragments, segments, micro- and unfinished projects produced with public funding, and circulating on public television and in educational spaces for youth and general audiences, rather than the feature films made for theatrical distribution by independent and for profit entertainment industries. At a transformational mid-century moment in the midst of renewed Indigenous rights movements and expanded access to the press and to media production and distribution, the 1970s gives us another archive and another origin story in North American Indigenous media history.

Warren Metcalf

Dr. Warren Metcalf

A full-length monograph of the history of the relationship between American Indians and the Mormon Church, from 1823 to the present. From the earliest days of the Church’s founding in 1830 to the present day, Mormon missionaries have carried the message of Moroni to the rest of the world and, quite purposefully, into the homelands of Native nations. The imperative of restoring the gospel of Jesus Christ to American Indians is the leitmotif of the Book of Mormon. There is another side to this story, the American Indian side, and it is less well known. American Indian people, from the Shawnee communities of the Ohio Valley, the Omahas at Council Bluff, Iowa, to the modern-day Southern Paiutes, Utes, and Shoshones of the Colorado Plateau, have dealt with Mormon efforts to redefine, convert, and assimilate them since the earliest days of the church in the 1830s. Like most stories of the frontier, it is also the story of attempted conquest through spiritual, cultural, and territorial encroachments, and like most frontiers, it has multiple points of contact and conflict. This account of the story includes both Mormon encroachments and Native strategies of resistance and accommodation.

Deonnie Moodie

Dr. Deonnie Moode

In this monograph, Dr. Moodie draws on archival and ethnographic source material to trace a transnational history of what she calls "business school religion" that produced and has been produced by elite American and Indian business over the past century and a half. American management expertise is dominant across the globe. It was in the United States that university business schools emerged in the 1880s, largely through departments of economics that took for granted capitalism's divine origins and the unique capability of Christians to harness its productive powers for the greater good. In the latter half of the twentieth century, after management knowledge had become a science scrubbed clean of that theological language, American-style business schools and their attendant models of employer benevolence and employee devotion proliferated. Formerly colonized nations including India sought this worldclass expertise to advance their developmentalist goals. In 1980s, when Indian scholars began to push back against the neo-imperialism of their institutions, they created Hindu modes of management that re-sacralized capitalist relations in a spiritual register. American and Indian business schools are now locked in a global feedback loop where one project reinforces the universality of the other. Moving between the U.S. and Indian contexts from the 1880s until the 2020s, Dr. Moodie demonstrates that this religion has taken alternate valences from Christian to scientific to Hindu to spiritual as management experts and business leaders alike have debated its terms.